1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Graphic Card Confusion, Question, and Recomendations

Discussion in 'PC hardware help' started by Mortition, Aug 31, 2009.

  1. Mortition

    Mortition Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    I recently replaced my GFX card on my older PC to breath some life back into it. I replaced a BFG NVIDIA GeForce 5500 OC 256MB PCI With a EVGA GeForce 9400 GT Video Card - 1GB DDR2, PCI (Dual Link) Dual DVI, HDTV, VGA, Low Profile

    I've got a
    Dell Dimension 2400
    1024MB RAM
    Intel Celeron 2.6 GH.z

    It's seems to be that overall performance of my computer is sluggish now than it was before I replaced the card.
    Whats more is that my MOBO only supports PCI not the newer PCI-E bus. But When I go the NVidia Control Panel and click the "System Information" button on the far bottom left corner, I see that the Bus type is PCI-E x1

    So.
    I've 3 questions.

    1. Am I going crazy?
    2. Or is there an actual compatibility issue here?
    3. What would be your recomendations of a GFX card for this PC?

    I'll post further info for those who are curious.
    Thank You.
     
  2. dailun

    dailun Active member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,074
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Your graphics will always be underwhelming with that PC since you only have a 32 bit 33MHz PCI bus.

    According to the Dell specs, that's all that you have:

    http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/systems/dim2400/en/sm_en/specs.htm

    In addition, since your graphics is sharing the same PCI bus as everything else, performace is bound to suffer.

    I would forklift the motherboard and keep the CPU if you're on a budget.

    If you had more money to spend I'd buy a more recent CPU/mobo combo.

    Throwing money at graphics to improve performance is, IMHO a losing proposition for that PC.
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2009
  3. Mortition

    Mortition Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    TY for your response.
     
  4. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Your PC probably has some PCIe 1x and PCI slots, but not the 16x required for graphics. This was common with low budget PCs in the early era. You really need a complete new system to get decent games performance, as PCI simply can't handle modern graphics due to its vastly lower bandwidth (133MB/s for PCI, 8,000MB/s for PCIe 16x)
     
  5. KillerBug

    KillerBug Active member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,802
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    If you can get a refund, or even store credit for that new card, you should. PCI 3D graphics cards are a total scam...and you will NEVER find a good use for one. The only use for PCI graphics cards is to replace burned out onboard video with video that is just as bad, but in a PCI flavor. Even if it had the whole PCI bus to itself, it would still have only a small fraction of the bandwidth needed for anything 3D.
     
  6. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Or to do what I did, and replace 32MB SiS onboard graphics from an old Socket A Sempron system with something a little less "&*@!.
     
  7. dailun

    dailun Active member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,074
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Like an ATI Rage XL 32MB? <G>
     
  8. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    I used a Sapphire Radeon 9250 actually :p (128MB)
     
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2009

Share This Page