Subscribe to AfterDawn's weekly newsletter.
why does it take so long for rebuilder?...
#1
10 Mar 2010 @ 14:51
gitoy
Send private message to this user
Junior Member
i got a laptop 3 weeks ago...i5, 4g, 320g 5400rpm...i figured this is fairly fast...so why did it take 178 min to encode a 7.19g movie?...
AfterDawn
Advertisement
#2
11 Mar 2010 @ 15:19
DVD RB is a resource hog. it does alot of numerical calculations. If u use ur task manager, under performance, u will c that the cpu is used at 100 %
Even with an i7 920, DVD RB takes a while
Even with an i7 920, DVD RB takes a while
"The flimsier the product,the higher the price"
Ferengi 82nd rule of aqusition

Ferengi 82nd rule of aqusition

#3
11 Mar 2010 @ 15:22
I have a lowly Quad Core, Q6600 (not overclocked). I use HC Encoder (free) with Rebuilder, main movie mode only takes approx 45mins, full disc episodic mode only takes approx 1 hour..
..and yes all 4 cores are maxxed out with HC, which is great as it's utilising all available CPU power
..and yes all 4 cores are maxxed out with HC, which is great as it's utilising all available CPU power
This message has been edited since its posting. Latest edit was made on 11 Mar 2010 @ 15:24

Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules ***
#4
11 Mar 2010 @ 18:16
gitoy
Junior Member
thanks for the replies guys...
so i transcoded the main movie with shrink...took a little over 29 min...
are my eyes deceiving me?...i have a hard time seeing the improvement with rebuilder...do i just need to get used to the rebuilder image quality?...
so i transcoded the main movie with shrink...took a little over 29 min...
are my eyes deceiving me?...i have a hard time seeing the improvement with rebuilder...do i just need to get used to the rebuilder image quality?...
#5
11 Mar 2010 @ 18:34
DVD RB shines (in the quality dept) when u r at higher compression (say >75%). then u will see a great difffernce in quality over shrink
"The flimsier the product,the higher the price"
Ferengi 82nd rule of aqusition

Ferengi 82nd rule of aqusition

#6
12 Mar 2010 @ 6:11
gitoy
Junior Member
thanks iluvendo...
so how do i encode only the movie in rebuilder?...is there a reauthor option in rebuilder?...
so how do i encode only the movie in rebuilder?...is there a reauthor option in rebuilder?...
#7
13 Mar 2010 @ 11:28
dialysis1
AfterDawn Addict
Originally posted by gitoy:
thanks iluvendo...
so how do i encode only the movie in rebuilder?...is there a reauthor option in rebuilder?...
Only in the Pro version.
99% of all problems are between the computer and the chair.
#8
15 Mar 2010 @ 4:38
gitoy
Junior Member
Originally posted by iluvendo:okay guys...i finally have seen the light...rebuilder is better than shrink, i can hardly tell the rb copy with the best settings from the original...haleluyah!!!...
DVD RB shines (in the quality dept) when u r at higher compression (say >75%). then u will see a great difffernce in quality over shrink
so i have the one click with img automatic option...just set and forget...and i can still multitask...
i have been "rebuilding" my library...sure would like to know how to make the process go faster...
#9
15 Mar 2010 @ 14:09
gitoy
Junior Member
just checked my last backup...prepare/encode/rebuild completed in 496 min...this is in best setting...7.60gb...
is this normal?...any suggestions for faster backup?...thanks guys...
is this normal?...any suggestions for faster backup?...thanks guys...
#10
15 Mar 2010 @ 15:32
dailun
AfterDawn Addict
" . . any suggestions for faster backup?"
You're not going to want to hear this, but I'll tell you anyway.
Use different software. I use AnyDVD/CloneDVD and I have never had a DVD take more than 30 minutes to rip/compress. I use an Athlon X2 5600+
Sometime it's worth paying money for the convenience.
You're not going to want to hear this, but I'll tell you anyway.
Use different software. I use AnyDVD/CloneDVD and I have never had a DVD take more than 30 minutes to rip/compress. I use an Athlon X2 5600+
Sometime it's worth paying money for the convenience.
#11
15 Mar 2010 @ 16:03
I'm thinking there must be something strange going on for the OP's i5 CPU giving times inferior to my Q6600; i know it's a laptop but even so, the 178 and 496 minute runtimes are seriously off the scale. Come to think of it even my olde worlde Athlon 2800XP (2.08GHz Barton CPU) used to take 5 hours for main movie mode (the 2800 was my main Rebuilder machine prior to the Q6600). The OP would be better sticking to the superior DVD Rebuilder, we just need to figure out why it's taking so long..
edit- here's some interesting runtimes comparisons for DVD Shrink & DVD Rebuilder
edit- here's some interesting runtimes comparisons for DVD Shrink & DVD Rebuilder
This message has been edited since its posting. Latest edit was made on 15 Mar 2010 @ 16:07

Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules ***
#12
15 Mar 2010 @ 18:47
gitoy
Junior Member
okay...last one is 214 min...this was during the afternoon...task manager shows 40-50ish cpu usage...the 496 min was overnight...guys, you think my antivirus, avast, adaware, spybot, might be scanning at night?...will that slow down the process?...any other ideas?...
btw, how do i post my logfile?...
btw, how do i post my logfile?...
#13
15 Mar 2010 @ 18:55
I can't remember the location of Rebuilder's logfile as i'm on a linux machine, not sure the logfile would help identify the problem to be honest, but it wouldn't hurt. Search the PC for rebuiilder.txt, i think that's what it's called, and you'll see each movie is mentioned in the logfile (so basically just post a section for one movie, say the 496minute one).
I use AVG across all my Windows machines, and i never disable it even on slower machines, i don't find it interferes with anything.
Spybot does take a sizeable CPU hit, but i only run that manually now and then (ie i don't have anything from Spybot running in memory), i no longer use adaware but when i did i only fired it up to do a manual scan also.
I use AVG across all my Windows machines, and i never disable it even on slower machines, i don't find it interferes with anything.
Spybot does take a sizeable CPU hit, but i only run that manually now and then (ie i don't have anything from Spybot running in memory), i no longer use adaware but when i did i only fired it up to do a manual scan also.
This message has been edited since its posting. Latest edit was made on 15 Mar 2010 @ 18:57

Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules ***
#14
15 Mar 2010 @ 23:30
dialysis1
AfterDawn Addict
Try not to have any other programs running.
99% of all problems are between the computer and the chair.
#15
18 Mar 2010 @ 13:08
PCH_Dude
Junior Member
Originally posted by gitoy:Unheard of. I am using a Toshiba Satellite Core 2 Duo T8100 @ 2.1GHZ and the average 7GB discs takes about 120-140 to rebuilt. You should be in the same neighborhood because an i5 is basically a Dual-Core with 'Hyper-Threading Technology' enabled.
i got a laptop 3 weeks ago...i5, 4g, 320g 5400rpm...i figured this is fairly fast...so why did it take 178 min to encode a 7.19g movie?...
#16
18 Mar 2010 @ 14:35
Ah, i see, i don't know the specs of i5's, i just assumed it was comparable (or better than) my Q6600.
This message has been edited since its posting. Latest edit was made on 18 Mar 2010 @ 14:35

Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules ***
#17
04 Apr 2010 @ 21:33
ZoSoIV
AfterDawn Addict
make sure you're ODDs are in DMA mode and NOT PIO mode that will cause a slow down and do the movie only instead of full disc that will help your times

Antec 1200 Full-Tower Case/Thermaltake 750-Watt PS/ASUS RAMPAGE FORMULA 775 Intel X48 Mobo/Seagate Barracuda 250GB 32MB Cache Sata HDD(primary)/Seagate Barracude 160GB Sata(slave)/NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2,1 GB of GDDR3 Memory /CORSAIR DOMINATOR PC8500 5-5-5-15 at 1066MHz (2x2GB) DDR2/Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 2.66GHz 12MB L2 Cache,OC(ed)to 3.4GHz on air/ Zalman 9700/3-Plextor PX-810SA Sata Drives/Samsung 2493HM 24" LCD Monitior 1920x1200 resolution,5ms respone time
#18
06 May 2010 @ 22:35
Originally posted by dailun:They do not rate with rebuilder, plus all Clone is movie only, cannot do a serial movies.
" . . any suggestions for faster backup?"
You're not going to want to hear this, but I'll tell you anyway.
Use different software. I use AnyDVD/CloneDVD and I have never had a DVD take more than 30 minutes to rip/compress. I use an Athlon X2 5600+
Sometime it's worth paying money for the convenience.
James T. Durkin
#19
07 May 2010 @ 2:37
Originally posted by gitoy:Dvd Rb free is not designed to optimally utilize multiple cores, but the Pro version is, so bite the bullet and purchase the pro version
just checked my last backup...prepare/encode/rebuild completed in 496 min...this is in best setting...7.60gb...
is this normal?...any suggestions for faster backup?...thanks guys...
"The flimsier the product,the higher the price"
Ferengi 82nd rule of aqusition

Ferengi 82nd rule of aqusition

#20
07 May 2010 @ 4:44
Paula_X
Suspended account
try transcoding the movie first using ffmpeg (the guts that RB uses).. anyhow.. what's the chances that some lappy (no doubt with wincrap7) is running mirrored raid on the same hdd making every write double time and going into sleepytime mode/powersave mode during any heavy process over 20 mins?
I have compared lappys over the years.. they NEVER perform up to specs in any measure against supposed identical hardware on a desktop. I don't rate the i5 anyway.. doesn't seem to have any balls... like comparing a celeron to a pentium of the same speed.. all hype, no guts. I regularly see the last p's outperform them for heavy high throughput tasks like transcoding in streamlined "one purpose" systems.
hunt down what is causing the slowdown.. don't waste money on software that probably isn't going to change the problem. I bet there is something running checking EVERY data write.. windows built in drm being a very likely suspect.
I have compared lappys over the years.. they NEVER perform up to specs in any measure against supposed identical hardware on a desktop. I don't rate the i5 anyway.. doesn't seem to have any balls... like comparing a celeron to a pentium of the same speed.. all hype, no guts. I regularly see the last p's outperform them for heavy high throughput tasks like transcoding in streamlined "one purpose" systems.
hunt down what is causing the slowdown.. don't waste money on software that probably isn't going to change the problem. I bet there is something running checking EVERY data write.. windows built in drm being a very likely suspect.
#21
07 May 2010 @ 5:55
dialysis1
AfterDawn Addict
Originally posted by iluvendo:I agree 100%.
Originally posted by gitoy:Dvd Rb free is not designed to optimally utilize multiple cores, but the Pro version is, so bite the bullet and purchase the pro version
just checked my last backup...prepare/encode/rebuild completed in 496 min...this is in best setting...7.60gb...
is this normal?...any suggestions for faster backup?...thanks guys...
#24
15 May 2010 @ 22:09
Quote:RB is basically a set of instructions telling other applications how to perform a set of tasks, and whether or not it can use more than one CPU core is determined by the application in symbiosis with it. To the point, RB doesn't choose the number of cores used to backup movies unless it can run the encoder more than once at the same time. With some encoders such as HC encoder that aren't smp aware it can run multiple instances which is why you see it display more than one window. Cinema Craft Encoder on the other hand is designed to use 2 cores out of the box which means if used with the free version it encodes at the same speed as the pro version.
Dvd Rb free is not designed to optimally utilize multiple cores, but the Pro version is, so bite the bullet and purchase the pro version
I agree 100%.
"Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/.
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/.
#25
11 Aug 2010 @ 22:17
tnt1125
Junior Member
Originally posted by creaky:I've got a AMD Phenom 9500 Quad Core w/4 GigRam. I agree with Creaky, HC encoder works great, 45-55 min average for a full movie.
I have a lowly Quad Core, Q6600 (not overclocked). I use HC Encoder (free) with Rebuilder, main movie mode only takes approx 45mins, full disc episodic mode only takes approx 1 hour..
..and yes all 4 cores are maxxed out with HC, which is great as it's utilising all available CPU power
This discussion thread has been automatically closed, as it hasn't received any new posts during the last 180 days. This means that you can't post replies or new questions to this discussion thread.
If you have something to add to this topic, use this page to post your question or comments to a new discussion thread.
If you have something to add to this topic, use this page to post your question or comments to a new discussion thread.

