G210M vs HD 3200

#1 17 Nov 2009 @ 0:55
I want to compare these two cards and know which one is better and by how much.

Im just looking at the HP Pavilion dv7-1245dx which has the hd 3200 and the Sony VAIO VPCCW13FX/R with the G210M 256 mb.

The Sony is more expensive, however the HP uses AMD dual core at 2.1 ghz while the Sony uses Intel Dual Core at 2.2ghz. Thanks.
This message has been edited since its posting. Latest edit was made on 17 Nov 2009 @ 0:58
AfterDawn Advertisement
#2 17 Nov 2009 @ 2:17
It doesn't really matter, neither can really play any game better than Minesweeper or Solitaire. I'd take the HD3200 because ATI have a proven track record for reliability at mobile graphics.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/5036
updated 25-May-11
#3 17 Nov 2009 @ 4:13
Plus, sony does not have the best reliability.


#4 17 Nov 2009 @ 4:14
Meh, to be honest I hear that about most laptop brands. I'm not that fond of Acers, some people hate HPs, others dislike Toshibas...



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/5036
updated 25-May-11
#5 17 Nov 2009 @ 6:32
I'd go with the Sony simply due to the processor... AMD's mobile CPUs aren't exactly the best, and the Intel is slightly higher clocked anyway.



PSP, all the way from 1.00 to 5.50 GEN D2 - DS Lite w/ M3DS Real (M3 Sakura v1.34)
PS3 3.01 - iPod Touch 2G 16GB Jailbroken - Xbox 360 60GB - PC, Q6600, 3GB DDR2, GTX260 (216) 896MB
#6 17 Nov 2009 @ 9:08
Clock speeds are quite frankly irrelevant these days. It really depends what the CPU is. I suspect you may be right, but don't assume clock speed is everything, it isn't.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/5036
updated 25-May-11
#7 17 Nov 2009 @ 11:09
I generally make a point of telling others that when a GHz battle starts - very few people seem to believe a Core i7 720 (1.66GHz) could be better than a Core 2 Duo T9300 (2.53GHz) :P

The fact the GHz value was higher was supposed to be a minor point, rather than the main one :)



PSP, all the way from 1.00 to 5.50 GEN D2 - DS Lite w/ M3DS Real (M3 Sakura v1.34)
PS3 3.01 - iPod Touch 2G 16GB Jailbroken - Xbox 360 60GB - PC, Q6600, 3GB DDR2, GTX260 (216) 896MB
#8 18 Nov 2009 @ 1:16
Oh ok, is there any other suggestions?
#9 18 Nov 2009 @ 3:23
Depends how much your budget is as to what we can suggest, really.



PSP, all the way from 1.00 to 5.50 GEN D2 - DS Lite w/ M3DS Real (M3 Sakura v1.34)
PS3 3.01 - iPod Touch 2G 16GB Jailbroken - Xbox 360 60GB - PC, Q6600, 3GB DDR2, GTX260 (216) 896MB
#10 18 Nov 2009 @ 10:35
This laptop is not really for much gaming at all. So a cheap laptop, but a fast one that can handle some games.

This one http://forums.afterdawn.com/t.cfm/f-216/which_laptop-814603/

is a gaming laptop budget. Help me on that thread too. Thanks.
And these laptops are for two different people of different budgets.
This message has been edited since its posting. Latest edit was made on 18 Nov 2009 @ 10:36
This discussion thread has been automatically closed, as it hasn't received any new posts during the last 180 days. This means that you can't post replies or new questions to this discussion thread.

If you have something to add to this topic, use this page to post your question or comments to a new discussion thread.

Subscribe to AfterDawn's weekly newsletter.