|
|
|
Ask Your Vista Questions Here.
|
|
Senior Member
|
9. January 2007 @ 11:26 |
Link to this message
|
|
First thougts: Love the look, love the feel, love the features. it is very easy to install (using vista rtm) and it seems like it is going to be a good system. But I said Going.
I was lucky enough to have driver for all of my devices for vista.
After messing with it, it is EXTREMELY BUGGY.
After being up and running for about 10 on a clean install, iTunes (7.0.2) caused a BSOD when importing my catalog and it did it multiple times. All of my Hardware have tested fine, even my ram (cause I know people been having trouble with it), but still got BSOD.
I really like it, but Im going to have to go back to XP until they fix the kinks
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
The_Fiend
Suspended permanently
|
9. January 2007 @ 12:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
Personally, i'm sticking with XP untill microsoft either makes PROPER new OS, or untill i become patient enough to use Linux for everything i do *and when slysoft starts making proper ports of it software for linux*
irc://arcor.de.eu.dal.net/wasted_hate
Wanna tell me off, go ahead.
I dare ya !
|
|
janrocks
Suspended permanently
|
9. January 2007 @ 17:37 |
Link to this message
|
I'm going nowhere near any more M$ rubbish.. I saw the light!!
Quote:
and Linus waved his hand, and lo! there was linux. And Linus looked upon linux and saw that it was good..
**jans' bible *** genesis 1.1**
I bet that gets quoted a bit...
As nobody has come near this I thought a link was in order.. (thanks Ktulu14)
http://linux.oneandoneis2.org/wrongms.htm
Follow it and have a good read.. I had some thoughts which I posted elsewhere, and repeat here in full..
Originally posted by janrocks(afterdark-post):
He says that there is a generation of computer savvy kids growing up who will know about malware, spam and trojans attached to email etc.. I don't believe it..the evidence..afterdawn forums and the proliferation of antivirus and anti-malware software out there..
The new generation are so used to the click and install they generally have the default for downloading set to download and install...no checks, no scans, just do it...because they have grown up in a world where patience is extinct! The world of "one click and I can use it"...The world Microshit have made.. No brain required...in fact it's a disadvantage to have one!!
That's why vista..not for any other reason than to attempt to make linux obsolete by bringing a whole new set of compatability problems with things as wide ranging as web pages to device drivers. All because we linux hardcore users..yeah,,us who have no M$ compatable software whatsover in our machines have caught up, and in many cases overtaken xp users, and managed to make our operating systems as easy to use, faster, and in many cases prettier than M$'s clunky old -fashioned behemoth.
This leads nicely to thoughts of the future.. As linux becomes easier to use it will attract more and more of the "click and install without thinking" brigade.. This will lead to more spyware and malware and our cosy safe internet..free from all that crap will be gone forever, just because Bill and his brigade of "we'll do your thinking for you" team have created a whole generation of them.. one click wonders, who don't even know what google is really for... It's not for finding out where to download games...it's to find where to get linux apps, and guides from..so you don't have to go to the effort of posting "help me" in forums unless it's really something odd... The last time I had a problem I couldn't find an answer to I lowered myself to post it in a few places, linux questions and various linux expert help places.. I have still never recieved an answer either from the applications home forums, or the debian help forums...not even an answer of "uhh we don't know, have you tried xyz?" from any of them..Can they all be really that stumped?
Maybe my question was too professional..grep logs and pastes from /var/log/errors/k3b.. with a full explanation of what I had tried and what I was thinking of trying next..just like application debuggers do.. Perhaps they thought "s*** somebody who knows more than we do, and can't find the solution...we don't want to look like n00bs"
Who knows..as nobody except a nice friend on AD replied the mystery will ever remain.. By the way.. his suggestion didn't work, but it did have an effect on the error which I was nice enough to post again in the thread for info.. and I learned about a feature within the application I had no idea existed.
I even filed it with the application bugtracker..and there it has sat for 2 months without having anything done with it. I have gone and worked out a solution myself, but it's not pretty and the bug remains..waiting to trip somebody else up...
And that's part of my point.. so called experts don't want to admit when they are honestly stumped in case they look just like the rest of us mere mortals, capable of errors and mistakes, and perhaps guilty of the greatest sin of all in the eyes of the other self proclaimed experts.. Admitting they don't know about some obscure facet within their field of expertese..
I ramble, but you get my drift...
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 10. January 2007 @ 18:33
|
Senior Member
|
11. January 2007 @ 11:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
halo 2 will be cracked for windows vista. So you don't need to get vista if you want to play halo 2. But i will get vista in 2 years.
|
Member
1 product review
|
11. January 2007 @ 11:56 |
Link to this message
|
|
I will get vista when it becomes a bit more established and it's had its first Service Pack.
|
Senior Member
|
11. January 2007 @ 13:17 |
Link to this message
|
Another copy protection scheme going down the tubes. The recent release of software that can be used to decode encrypted HD DVD and Blu-ray movies is the first step toward making the encryption standard used by these next-generation video players obsolete, Princeton University researchers said Monday.
Late last month, a hacker going by the name Muslix64 released software that could be used to decrypt movies that were encoded using the AACS (Advanced Access Content System) digital rights management specification. AACS is supported by Hollywood and video player manufacturers.
Introduced in April 2005, AACS is the copy protection system for HD DVD and Blu-ray movies. It is supported by companies such as Microsoft, Panasonic, Sony, Toshiba, Walt Disney and Warner Bros.
Arms Race
Muslix64's BackupHDDVD software did not crack AACS, but it will make it easier for some technically adept users to decrypt movies, said Alex Halderman, a Princeton computer science student who, along with noted researcher Ed Felten, is calling the software "the first step in the meltdown of AACS."
AACS devices use cryptographic techniques to read numeric codes, called 'keys,' from video discs. These keys are then used to unlock the digital content, making it readable on the player. Muslix64's software does not give users a way to discover these keys, but it does provide a way to descramble content once the key is uncovered.
"This is the framework through which the arms race is going to be fought," Halderman said. "They don't have the ammunition yet, but this is the gun."
All You Need Is The Key
AACS is supposed to work better than the CSS (content scrambling system) encryption system used to protect DVDs from unauthorized copying. CSS was cracked just a few years after its release by three hackers, including a 16-year-old Norwegian named Jon Johansen.
Unlike CSS, however, the AACS system gives movie companies a way of "revoking keys"--changing new movies so that these keys cannot be read on video players that have been cracked.
This system gives Hollywood a way of protecting new releases, but it only works if hackers publicize their work and disclose which player has been cracked. And even with key revocation, nothing can be done to prevent disks whose keys have already been published from being unlocked, Halderman said.
"What the future looks like to us is that some individuals will have cracks that they don't publish and which Hollywood is unable to revoke," he said. "Other people will have cracks that they do publish, and which will work for all old disks."
Trouble For Hollywood?
This scenario may not be so bad for the movie studios, so long as they are able to prevent widespread illegal distribution of their products and keep movies from being widely available while they are still being shown in theatres, said Mike McGuire, an analyst with Gartner Inc. "If they can preserve the existing [theatrical] release windows, then they're probably going to feel reasonably comfortable," he said.
Still, Halderman believes it's only a matter of time before the keys that can be used with BackupHDDVD become public and Hollywood will be faced with unauthorized copying of AACS-protected material. "There's just no doubt that title keys are going to become available at some point in the near future," he said. By, Robert McMillan, IDG News Service
|
Senior Member
|
11. January 2007 @ 14:14 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by rihgt682:
halo 2 will be cracked for windows vista. So you don't need to get vista if you want to play halo 2. But i will get vista in 2 years.
LOL, I have been playing halo 2 on the xbox for about 3 years now. But its all good.
|
|
The_Fiend
Suspended permanently
|
11. January 2007 @ 17:32 |
Link to this message
|
|
If i want to play Halo or Halo 2, i'll stick with my Xbox, like deezp1 *or my 360 for that matter*.
If i want to play pc games, i'll stick with CS or postal 2.
irc://arcor.de.eu.dal.net/wasted_hate
Wanna tell me off, go ahead.
I dare ya !
|
Senior Member
|
12. January 2007 @ 10:58 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by The_Fiend:
If i want to play Halo or Halo 2, i'll stick with my Xbox, like deezp1 *or my 360 for that matter*.
If i want to play pc games, i'll stick with CS or postal 2.
I couldn't agree more. I do like what M$ is doing with gaming for XP and Vista. The whole "Games for Windows" thing is pretty cool and its pretty neat in Vista. If you don't know about it, here is some info from the horses mouth:
The Games for Windows brand on games means four key things:
1) Quality. Games for Windows branded titles undergo extensive testing, and not just by the publisher. Microsoft also invests in quality checking each title to ensure they meet performance and reliability standards.
2) Compatibility. Games for Windows branded titles work on Windows XP and Windows Vista based PCs, including both 32 and 64 bit editions. Games for Windows titles that support controllers are also compatible with the Microsoft XBOX 360 controller for Windows, including the XBOX 360 Wireless Gaming Receiver for Windows. They even support widescreen resolutions and more.
3) Safety features. You can be confident that any title carrying the Games for Windows brand will support the new parental controls and family settings features in Windows Vista.
4) Easy to Play. Games for Windows branded titles are easy to install, find and remove, especially in Windows Vista. Every Games for Windows title appears in the new Windows Vista Games Explorer (no more hunting around the start menu for that game you just installed). And Games for Windows branded titles all offer some form of “easy install”, putting you in the game more quickly.
My Take:
1. Whatever, that should be a givin.
2. This is where M$ got it right, Wide screen, 64bit support, Gamepad compatible with 360 and PC controllers. This is great. I have a lot of friends that just dont know PC gaming because they are afraid to use the keyboard. With this, they can play the same games using the 360 controller.
3. Safety. EH, could care less, but I guess its necessary.
4. Easy to install should be a given, but the idea if you want to uninstall something and be sure that it is totally gone is good to know. Now the Game Explorer in Vista is Great I love the Idea of it and I love they way it works. (its a shame I can't use Vista because of iTunes BSOD. Damn you Apple!)
|
|
naruto73
Newbie
|
15. January 2007 @ 16:51 |
Link to this message
|
|
I have a question for anyone that can answer it. My computer is capable of running vista on all aspects except my ram is only 256 mb is it still capable to run it at least even if its slow?
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
15. January 2007 @ 16:57 |
Link to this message
|
|
no, you're asking for a crapload of suffering, there. you either need to put out the cash for more ram (good decision) or say "screw vista" (better decision).
|
|
naruto73
Newbie
|
15. January 2007 @ 17:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
Ok true but whats so bad about vista?
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
15. January 2007 @ 17:03 |
Link to this message
|
|
you haven't read this thread, have you?
just because a car is shiny and new doesn't mean it's going to run better than something ten years older. quality should be the determining factor. same applies with software.
|
Senior Member
|
15. January 2007 @ 17:30 |
Link to this message
|
|
Could'nt have said it better myself, also, if you are one that likes to backup his movies or music like so many do on AD, with vista you can kiss that goodbye.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
15. January 2007 @ 17:35 |
Link to this message
|
|
might as well sign over your testes when you purchase that license for vista.
the solution is to go linux, but most people are afraid (not like myself) or rely too much on their current setup because of their current situation (like myself). alas, converting is the only way to get the message across to the big boys in their highrise offices.
sigh.
|
Senior Member
|
15. January 2007 @ 18:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
Well I think it looks good but its a HUGE resource hog on my computer.
-EDIT, BTW, I have a 1.1GHz with 640MB.
Doesnt expecting the unexpected make the unexpected expected and therefore mean your expecting the expected which was the unexpected until you expected it?
"Opinions are immunities to being told were wrong." - Relient K
 This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 15. January 2007 @ 18:08
|
Senior Member
|
16. January 2007 @ 03:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
are we gonna do a countdown? well 15 days till it comes out. The thing i hate about vista is there is just way to many versions. When xp only had like 3 vista have like 5.
|
Senior Member
|
16. January 2007 @ 11:53 |
Link to this message
|
|
It IS out. Well, im not sure to the general public but it is out and around if you know where to look.
Doesnt expecting the unexpected make the unexpected expected and therefore mean your expecting the expected which was the unexpected until you expected it?
"Opinions are immunities to being told were wrong." - Relient K
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
16. January 2007 @ 11:58 |
Link to this message
|
|
it may be out, but why would anyone with even a hint more than mediocre computer usage skills want to run it?
|
Senior Member
|
16. January 2007 @ 12:04 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Auslander:
it may be out, but why would anyone with even a hint more than mediocre computer usage skills want to run it?
Who know. I only like it for the way it looks(which you can get with a theme pack). I had it once but reformated my whole harddrive to redo the partitions and I still havent installed it yet. And that was over a month ago, lol.
Doesnt expecting the unexpected make the unexpected expected and therefore mean your expecting the expected which was the unexpected until you expected it?
"Opinions are immunities to being told were wrong." - Relient K
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
16. January 2007 @ 12:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
ah, laziness. that's why i'm not on linux yet.
|
Senior Member
|
16. January 2007 @ 12:12 |
Link to this message
|
|
Its actually a combination of laziness and I dont want to sit and wait a couple hours for it to install... on top of the formating for the drive I want to put it on and files for it...
Doesnt expecting the unexpected make the unexpected expected and therefore mean your expecting the expected which was the unexpected until you expected it?
"Opinions are immunities to being told were wrong." - Relient K
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
16. January 2007 @ 12:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
ah, so laziness and impatience.
|
Senior Member
|
16. January 2007 @ 12:29 |
Link to this message
|
|
ah, so you understand.
Doesnt expecting the unexpected make the unexpected expected and therefore mean your expecting the expected which was the unexpected until you expected it?
"Opinions are immunities to being told were wrong." - Relient K
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
16. January 2007 @ 12:37 |
Link to this message
|
|
every now and again, two mortal men will wind up on the same mental wavelength. you and i, we understand that the amazing thing about the art of procrastination is
^.~
|
|
