|
List of recommended LAME MP3 encoder settings - the highest quality MP3 encoder.
|
|
|
cd-rw.org
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
28. August 2002 @ 00:18 |
Link to this message
|
|
I wouldn't say MP3s are crap just because they are lossy compressed. Using quality encoder like LAME with good settings like --alt-preset standard will give you excellent quality that you won't be able to hear differing from the original. Other lossy formats include: OGG Vorbis, AAC MP4, MusePack, Dolby AC3 (used in DVDs)...
If you want lossless 100% quality then have a look at Monkeys Audio at the software section.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
piefeet
Newbie
|
4. October 2002 @ 18:51 |
Link to this message
|
|
I surfed for ages to find my dream lame setting and think i seen it in this thread so registered just to comment.
I do like the idea of vbr because in theory it should be more efficient, but Im ripping my cds for fileshare too and compatibility is important to me -It would be nice not to dump all the mp3 players that have problems with vbr.
It seems a perfect compromise then to use the max bitrate -B256 recommended here, combined with the --alt-preset standard or extreme vbrs ,generously & highly tuned by people with better ears and amps than I.
As well as help fudged mp3 players, this setting will presumably lower the average bitrate of the file a little too.
I have wondered what the purpose of the 320 frames in vbr is since I remmember reading that transparent cd/mp3 listening had been achieved at 256 cbs or is that just a r3mix myth?
If not it would seem to follow to use 256 as the bitrate ceiling for everything except stuff for studio or ultra hifi applications -that pretty much need wav anyway.
Ill have to wait and see if the -B256 setting produces pesky artifacts with altpreset not designed to accomodate it.
It would be great to see a preset tuned for the 256 ceiling, specialy for challenged but otherwise functional players, as it is, I think there is a fair chance of it being the spot im looking to hit,
l8r,
&y
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 4. October 2002 @ 18:55
|
|
cd-rw.org
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
5. October 2002 @ 00:41 |
Link to this message
|
|
Limiting the highest bitrate in VBR usage is NOT recommended. When encoding in CBR, the encoder has some headroom known as "bit reservoir" which allows it to dedicate more bits to complex segments of the song. When using VBR, there is no bit reservoir, but the encoder chooses a bigger frame bitrate instead. Therefore limiting the maximum bitrate for any variable VBR setting may harm the damage.
If you are concerned about the compatibility issues, then you should go CBR.
About the r3mix.net...it's content is out of date and often criticized for false statements and analysis. I think is safe to say that 256CBR with LAME is very good and should satisfy 99,99% of people, but you will always find a trained batear somewhere that tells you it's not good enough.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 5. October 2002 @ 00:47
|
|
piefeet
Newbie
|
5. October 2002 @ 03:02 |
Link to this message
|
|
I shouldnt have implied a 256 limit is a general recommendation, Tangent had suggested it can be useful for compatibility.
That is intresting about the bit reservior, I can see how that means cbr 256 will have a slightly higher quality potential than vbr with 256 limit.
The major difference between 256 cbr for compatibility and 256 limited vbr is filesizes at fixed 256 or ~around 180 adaptive /20% more tracks in a playlist.
I'll listen out for artifacts in my new rips though.
Thanks for comment,
&y
edit: youve gone and put the doubt in me now though, about 10% of the frames in my muse-muscle mad rips were 320 .Blastit!
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 5. October 2002 @ 03:16
|
|
Shoey
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
4. March 2003 @ 02:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
^bump^, sorry....
Shoey
Asus K8N nVidia nForce3 Pro 250 GB, Athlon 64 3200+, Hitachi 80 gig SATA 150, Corsair XMS 1 gig PC4000, ATI Radeon Saphire 9600 Pro (256 DDR), Windows XP Pro (64 Bit),Lite-ON SOHD 167T,, Plextor PX-712SA,BenQ 1640.
 This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 4. March 2003 @ 02:30
|
AfterDawn Addict
2 product reviews
|
6. March 2008 @ 07:44 |
Link to this message
|
|
Edit...
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 8. April 2009 @ 15:05
|
AfterDawn Addict
2 product reviews
|
19. March 2008 @ 11:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
Someone downloaded it..
I think am gonna stick with CBR320 INSANE, am not fussed on conserving disc space.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 19. March 2008 @ 11:39
|
|
Karimm
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
23. May 2008 @ 13:25 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
|
Karimm
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
23. May 2008 @ 13:29 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
|
warp9pnt9
Newbie
|
24. May 2008 @ 02:55 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Karimm:
When I wish to listen music I must go with mp3 tag editor so I must try {URL}
Originally posted by Karimm:
You need only {URL} to know all about mp3 tag editor.
There's a right way and a wrong way to advertise on the internet. PAYING the forum per click to place a banenr ad in their banner space on each page is the RIGHT way. Posting bogus messages to junk software while adding NOTHING to the discussion is the WRONG way.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
digirammy
Newbie
|
21. October 2008 @ 15:39 |
Link to this message
|
I am o glad I got nero to finally work right! I was having issues burning my newest addition of Arden Kaywin songs. I was having mad issues with nero now burning but turns out the disc I was putting in had a tiny bit of data already burned on it. Stupidest thing ever! rawr!!!!!!!
|
