|
********What Game, What firmware?? please post here!!!!********
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
10. December 2006 @ 10:58 |
Link to this message
|
|
Wait, my MGS:PO says it requires firmware 2.81 not 3.02. Can anyone else who has the ISO confirm this?
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
10. December 2006 @ 11:03 |
Link to this message
|
|
nice one man! i like this guide bro!
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
10. December 2006 @ 11:05 |
Link to this message
|
|
@eternalis, i thought that too, but someione corrected me and sed 3.02( although i didnt think so) :S well ill wait for people to confirm then change
@reazen no problem man, im just glad you took time to help me out, thank you
@ touran, thanks :)
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 10. December 2006 @ 11:06
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
10. December 2006 @ 11:09 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yeah I'm pretty sure MGS:PO is 2.81. People are just saying that its 3.01/3.02 as it works with the new DevHook w/ 3.02 emulation but not the old one (DevHook 0.46).
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
10. December 2006 @ 11:13 |
Link to this message
|
|
yer theres isnt a umd upgrade to 3.00 yet, ti must be 2.81. thnx :)
soooooooo has anyone got any umd movies for me as they are looking rather low :(
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 10. December 2006 @ 11:16
|
Senior Member
|
10. December 2006 @ 11:19 |
Link to this message
|
|
yeah it does require 2.81
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
10. December 2006 @ 11:20 |
Link to this message
|
|
theres my confirmation, changed !!
|
Senior Member
|
10. December 2006 @ 15:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
nice guide btw, its good for people that cannot run devhook
|
Senior Member
|
10. December 2006 @ 15:22 |
Link to this message
|
|
Senior Member
|
10. December 2006 @ 15:43 |
Link to this message
|
|
this one is better though
|
Senior Member
|
10. December 2006 @ 15:50 |
Link to this message
|
|
yeah i know, just some more to add to the list.
|
Senior Member
|
10. December 2006 @ 16:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
you can add a EUR and USA to Metal Gear Solid Portable ops and Outrun 2006 if you want.
|
|
Hydra
Member
|
10. December 2006 @ 18:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
thank you eternalis for confirming, now we know everyone here plays pirated games and dont even touch the actual UMD's... good to know
uhm...
|
Senior Member
|
11. December 2006 @ 02:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
not really. i don't play pirated games.
|
|
Hydra
Member
|
11. December 2006 @ 04:46 |
Link to this message
|
|
I didnt say it was you, it obviously cant be since you provided confirmation as to what firmware was on it.
uhm...
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
11. December 2006 @ 05:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
@ frankie, i did see it to be honest and thats hwere my list began, but i feel this one could get better over time
|
Senior Member
|
13. December 2006 @ 14:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
yeah. Does anyone have the Brother in Arms D-Day firmware requirement. I'm thinking of buying the UMD
|
Senior Member
|
13. December 2006 @ 14:15 |
Link to this message
|
|
i believe it is 2.81
|
Senior Member
|
13. December 2006 @ 14:26 |
Link to this message
|
|
thanks
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. December 2006 @ 14:32 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Hydra:
now we know everyone here plays pirated games and dont even touch the actual UMD's... good to know
How do you know that?
|
|
Hydra
Member
|
13. December 2006 @ 17:28 |
Link to this message
|
|
Brothers in arms D day is 2.81, im positive im holding it in my psp right now. How do you like the controls on it, Im not a huge fan, im way to used to MOH right now.
And the reason why that was said eternalis was because everyone was saying the umd requirement for mgs:po was 3.01, meaning that they all probably just had the ISO with the update ripped, and since it ran on the 3.01 firmware DH, people assumed that the update that was included with the disc was version 3.01. But if you were to use the legitimate UMD, you would know it was a 2.81. Didnt mean to be a ****, I was just saying. :)
uhm...
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. December 2006 @ 17:32 |
Link to this message
|
|
Ah I see.
I haven't played Brothers In Arms yet tho, what are the controls like? Are they really bad? And cant you change the control "scheme" like you can in MOH?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. December 2006 @ 17:33
|
|
Hydra
Member
|
14. December 2006 @ 22:18 |
Link to this message
|
|
MOH:H has way better setting schemes than this game does(it has 4 or 5), You'll know what I mean once you play it(BIA). Or you may think its the most brilliant scheme ever, but in my opinion it pretty bad, the advanced is a little less miserable. Just my 2 cents though like I said
I dont think you can run either, either that or I missed it in the tutorial. So its pretty slow paced compared to moh
uhm...
|
Senior Member
|
15. December 2006 @ 02:20 |
Link to this message
|
|
i thought MOH was good despite the short story.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Junior Member
|
15. December 2006 @ 05:30 |
Link to this message
|
|
nice work hodgins91! cool guide. this is helpfull specialy for the 2.8 whose still kinda stuck in the middle of upgrade and downgrade! u dont have Need For Speed Carbon on ur list, what FW does it require?
|
