Subscribe to AfterDawn's weekly newsletter.
FFDSHOW - A better DivX decoder?
#1
21 Apr 2002 @ 14:18
cd-rw.org
Send private message to this user
Senior Member
4 product reviews
http://cutka.szm.sk/xvid/xvid.html
I would like to hear your comments on this DivX / XviD decoder filter. I am certainly impressed in it's performance.
Note: Seems to crash ZoomPlayer, but WMP runs ok.
I would like to hear your comments on this DivX / XviD decoder filter. I am certainly impressed in it's performance.
Note: Seems to crash ZoomPlayer, but WMP runs ok.
AfterDawn
Advertisement
#2
22 Apr 2002 @ 16:12
Hello,
I have tested with my old PII 233 with a TNT card and all that I can say, it's that works :-). At last I can see movies on my old computer. I have tested several players not deeply, but the one that works fine for me is bsplayer. I grabbed a copy from its site and it works. My system is like I said before, a PII 233, Creative Labs TNT 16 mbytes, 320 mbytes of ram and win2k pro.
See you :-).
I have tested with my old PII 233 with a TNT card and all that I can say, it's that works :-). At last I can see movies on my old computer. I have tested several players not deeply, but the one that works fine for me is bsplayer. I grabbed a copy from its site and it works. My system is like I said before, a PII 233, Creative Labs TNT 16 mbytes, 320 mbytes of ram and win2k pro.
See you :-).
#3
23 Apr 2002 @ 13:41
Confirmed - BSPlayer works nicely with FFDSHOW.
I would like to hear more opinions about the quality, since I haven't done that much DivX encoding or comparing. To me it SEEMS that the post-processing doesn't blur the details as badly as the original DivX.
I would like to hear more opinions about the quality, since I haven't done that much DivX encoding or comparing. To me it SEEMS that the post-processing doesn't blur the details as badly as the original DivX.
#4
28 Apr 2002 @ 6:57
Quick experiments with a low-bitrate DivX show a clear advantage in using the fddshow's automatic quality control. Less blockiness, especially on high frequency (ie. sharp contrast) edges. Also the CPU consumption seems to be considerably lower when using fddshow.
Definitely worth using!
Definitely worth using!
This discussion thread has been automatically closed, as it hasn't received any new posts during the last 180 days. This means that you can't post replies or new questions to this discussion thread.
If you have something to add to this topic, use this page to post your question or comments to a new discussion thread.
If you have something to add to this topic, use this page to post your question or comments to a new discussion thread.
