1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

burning speed

Discussion in 'Nero discussion' started by redbirded, Dec 12, 2005.

  1. redbirded

    redbirded Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I was told that you can get better video quality if you burn at a slower speed. i.e... 2x is better than 16x. Is this true or was I talking to an idiot?
     
  2. Ben2

    Ben2 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Before I knew how wrong I was I burned over 200 disk at 8X all of them good quality.
    After spending a lot of time lurking on this site I discovered that I was doing it all wrong. I burned the last 900 disk at 4X.

    I can not tell the difference in color or sound between the two but the experts say to burn at 4X so that is what I do.
    That way if I post with a problem they can not say -- I told you so.
     
  3. redbirded

    redbirded Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    O.K. 4x is the best> Thanks. Any objections anyone?
     
  4. alkohol

    alkohol Regular member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    4,125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    For DVD burning, I highly recommend burning at 4X (it's the best and safest). Go here http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/265933 for more info on burning 4X versus 16X burning. I've tested with my own eyes, the 16X burning results were poor on Nero CD-DVD Speed scans. Even if I burned with top notch media like genuine Yuden, Verbatim "Advanced Azo" and Maxell (Hitachi - made in japan), I still keep it at 4X because I don't want any of my valuable backups turns into "coasters" and freeze down the road.
     

Share This Page