|
Blockbuster hit by fraud lawsuit in N.J.
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 19 February, 2005
Movie rental giant Blockbuster has been hit by a fraud lawsuit in New Jersey. New Jersey Attorney General Peter Harvey sued Blockbuster Inc. Friday, claiming the video rental chain is deceiving customers with its new "No More Late Fees" rental policy. Blockbuster is accused of violating the states consumer fraud laws with its new policy. "Blockbuster boldly announced its 'No More Late Fees' ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
|
aabbccdd
Suspended permanently
|
22. February 2005 @ 21:56 |
Link to this message
|
|
HEY i have a idea LETS END THIS THREAD iam really tired of it.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
daemonzx6
Senior Member
|
23. February 2005 @ 16:16 |
Link to this message
|
|
yeah, we should end this thread.
For the record, I saw a sign at Blockbuster dictating their actual policy, it said "Need a few extra days? ...go ahead," which is really what this new policy is. I have not however seen any big signs relating to the so titled "fine print."
|
|
evilthug
Newbie
|
24. February 2005 @ 14:10 |
Link to this message
|
|
If you want this thread ended...why do you keep coming back to read it? If there is any store without a sign with the "fine print" posted it is a $500 dollar fine from corporate to that store manager. Therefore, that location you went to either has a sign that you missed, or you didnt read the fine print, you read the bold words on top and said screw reading the rest. Or that store weekly charges their store manager $500...wouldnt that be fun?
|
|
Sickman1
Suspended permanently
|
26. February 2005 @ 04:48 |
Link to this message
|
|
ah this is so classick. this simple...if you dont like Wal-mart go to Kmart. If you dont Like Blue jeans try on Green jeans. Choices and opinions are great. but why does redudantcy(??) have to be so addictive?
|
|
natitfj
Newbie
|
1. March 2005 @ 11:13 |
Link to this message
|
|
Rant
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, which is what makes this country useless in a communist perspective. I for one have a fight against some of your opinions so flamebait me all you want.
First off, the legal implications against Block Buster are strictly due to the false advertising that they employed on TV ads. RTFA! The FTC (.gov) has a truth in advertising law that states that all commercials advertised or broadcasted within US/FCC control must have a truth, or must be proven true advertising. Block Buster advertised “NO MORE LATE FEES”, however this is a broad statement, which does not clearly state zero fees charged for returning a video after a certain amount of time. No one saw this but the legal department of Block Buster. Block Buster was loosing rental sales against online rental business like Netflix. In retaliation Block Buster decided to offer a online rental capability, while having a prominent presents around the country (as in having storefronts) they had to enact the no late fee advertising in order to gain the revenue towards the online/offline rental sales. The current legal suit against Block Buster is due to the fact that they falsely advertised the “NO MORE LATE FEES”, and I know for sure as soon as the media heard of this case, people took opinions and facts and ‘miskeewd’ the legal case. Again someone please read the actual case argument against whatever before taking sides. This would help… prove a point.
Next point! I agree, people should not keep a rented DVD/video for over a month, and this is where the current arguments are fighting over. People are being charged a whole retail loss cost for a movie rented and kept after a certain amount of time. This is a automated system, so the system automatically confirms that a movie has not been returned by a set deadline, then the computer system does a CC charge for the amount of the movie. However the movie is still kept in record that it is rented, then by the final day if the movie is returned before the system drops the movie from loss inventory track, the charge is charged back (reverse charge) to Block Buster. Again, there is that $1.25 ‘restocking fee’ It is still not clear as to what that restocking fee is accounting for. Would it be accounting that they have to place that DVD into another container with a active bar code? Because that would make no sense, due to the fact the computer system recognized that the movie was returned. I have other theory-based arguments on this but I’ll keep that out of this conversation. Again, people should not keep movies for a prolonged amount of time, because there is a limited order/ownership that the rental companies have of each new release.
Who is Better, Netflix or Block Buster? That is all opinion-based arguments; people cannot fight over this statement because this is personal opinion statement. However people can fight over someone claiming a false fact. Realize that my opinion is leaning towards netflix. I prefer netflix because of the convenience, of order 3+ DVDs and they all arrive in my front door (mailbox) within 1 business day. I have no problems with this because I AM a anti-socialistic prick. America is moving towards this social trend, and if you have not realized this by now, then take a closer look at how the current marketing trend is heading, which will give you a better perspective of what American citizens want. Block Buster is a great rental outlet market, but again I am a person that socially does not want to interact with people. It is not because I could be this hideous disfigured man that is bent on ruling the world. It is because I find the majority of those around me ignorant, and just within my tastes to take a baseball bat to anyone that does a stupid thing. (Goes to show why I follow in the IT security career field, I’m a logical thinker)
Finally, The customer/employee have the obligation to know what they are doing. Of course the business aspect of the client/business perspective knows that the customer will not ask questions and sign said statement here with out asking questions. Businesses/Corporations have a obligation to inform their customers what they are getting into. Have you ever signed a bank loan statement without reading the fine print? If you have that is your fault that when you fail to make the payments on time, or decide to stop paying, when that time comes for you to go to court, the judge rules against the person without valid reasoning. Whenever I create a SOW or RFP, or even a said contract I explain either the complete run down of the contract or I explain the actual terms of the contract to my clients. By the time they sign the contract, they firmly know the extent of the terms. This is also where anyone that in anti Block Buster needs to shove a beat stick where the sun don’t shine, because it is also the customers responsibility to understand terms whether or not they are in a hurry.
/rant
"Don't Forget to Salt the Fries!"
|
Member
|
3. March 2005 @ 09:35 |
Link to this message
|
|
@ natitfj
just a friendly reminder: people wont read something that long. if they wanted to read war and peace, theyd buy it.
--im the only john wayne left in this town--
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 3. March 2005 @ 09:38
|
|
madgreek
Suspended permanently
|
3. March 2005 @ 10:22 |
Link to this message
|
|
In terms of Blockbuster Vs. Netflix, I have had both. I can tell you that in terms of effeiceny both are terrible. At least this is my expierence. Blockbuster is absoultely terrible!! They say they send a dvd on one day...but it takes 3-4 days for the movies to come. Netflix takes 1-2 days. Something tells me blockbuster lies when they say they send. I actually just signed up in the store for blockbuster movie pass. That is the best way. I also did not get disks becuase my mailman was watching them too...
|
Senior Member
|
3. March 2005 @ 10:40 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
just a friendly reminder: people wont read something that long. if they wanted to read war and peace, theyd buy it.
yup, skipped straight over it LOL
|
|
natitfj
Newbie
|
3. March 2005 @ 16:21 |
Link to this message
|
|
not of my concern... just wanted to post my opinion. I was bored at work, got a phone call from a customer looking for EIN info for BB, and I came across this thread.
decided to post... if you read it, then great, your a bit more intelligent than the next gent. If not, maybe I was not enlightening enough.
|
|
dorkchop
Newbie
|
3. March 2005 @ 21:29 |
Link to this message
|
|
To all of those in states that are considering or acting on a law suit like this, now is the time to tell those responsible to stop.Cast aside the fact that instead of paying $8.66 for a movie that is 7 days late you are only stuck with $1.25.Cast aside that you could, if you were irresponsible and rude,keep the movie a further 30 days for the same $1.25 instead of another $40 in late fees.Cast aside that Blockbuster offers three movie pass options that save you money on rentals and already offered no more late fees.Consider instead where this ignorant suit is going to end up.Either the no late fees will end, not good for the consumer, or the restocking fee will go away as well as the ability to return the movie, sticking you with the purchase price of the video, again not the best for the consumer.No good will come of this.There is no other options.You take the purchase of the movie and restocking fee options out and don't replace them with something, then Blockbuster would essentialy be selling the videos for $4.33.Obviously that's not going to happen, for they surely would go out of business.If you don't understand the no late fees policy it will be explained to you and there are brochures at the register, or will be supplied at your request.No aspect of this is hidden.The only thing hidden if you don't understand this is the functionality of yourself in society.YOU HAVE 7 DAYS TO RETURN THE MOVIE AFTER THE DUE DATE.If you can't do that then you are not intelligent enough, nor do you have the manners to not only rent a movie but function in society.These people "acting in our best interest" by bringing these law suits are not doing that.They will cost us money in the long run.For those that want to complain about how Blockbuster treats their employees, for starters that is not the issue here.Second, I have worked for both now and I can tell you as a person that hired at both, Blockbuster is twice the company that Hollywood ever dreamed of being.Someone mentioned that they knew someone that made $8 an hour as an assistant.I live in one of the poorer markets in America and made as much as an assistant at Blockbuster as I did as a Manager at Hollywood, and didn't have to work 65 hours a week at Blockbuster to do so.Furthermore, no assistant that I know makes near that amount.In fact most shift leaders don't make that little.One more on this topic, at Hollywood I hired CSR's in at minimum wage, and at blockbuster they were hired in at much more than that.As far as competing with Netflix goes, Blockbuster has their own online service which is at a better price and deal than Netflix.Your mail time should be considerably less since at Blockbuster your movies will be coming from a store in YOUR town or the closest one to it.Netflix in my area(I used to subscribe) was sent to a state a 1000 miles away.HMMMMM.Which would make it to my house first?The bottom line to all this is this:these people bringing these lawsuits against Blockbuster will end up costing you money, and will be ending a good thing that doesn't hurt anyone but the irresponsible.
|
Moderator
|
3. March 2005 @ 22:03 |
Link to this message
|
|
Wow. A career video store employee managed to write all that?
|
|
madgreek
Suspended permanently
|
12. March 2005 @ 09:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
Wow man don't get crazy. This "back ups" for you!
The MadGreek
Rig #1..ehhehe
Celeron 2.4 (non D) oc'd to 3.2ghz
idle 38..load..44
1.0 gig 2700 ram
8x lite on dvd burner and dvd reader
Dvd Players- JVC Progressive scan and Cyberhome 300
Rig #2
Celeron 2.4 (non d) not overclocked yet heheh
512 me
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
12. March 2005 @ 10:01 |
Link to this message
|
|
Here is the way to solve some of these issues:
Forget about New Release Rentals for two days only and make all movies 7 days. Stock enough DVD’s for customers to be able to view a New release in the first week instead of having small inventories of them that force the customer to come back day after day and not find them available still, example; (Flight of the Phoenix.) And spell out completely what they meant by No More Late Fees!
If you are going to say No More Late Fee’s then do just that and don’t charge anything for bringing in a movie late. Don’t change the language to a re-stocking fee. Are you really saying that there is a difference between placing a movie back on the shelf after 6 days or 8 days? Does it take any more muscle, knowledge, effort, manpower, equipment, machinery, whatever to place that movie back on a shelve? Of course not, so why the re-stocking fee bullcrap. It is a late fee and that’s all there is to it! Blockbuster needs their ass to get sued so they can get their wording straight. The only reason they even attempted any changes is because they are getting their shorts eaten by the Netflix and the Hollywood videos out there.
|
Senior Member
|
30. March 2005 @ 09:52 |
Link to this message
|
"From now on we are poison to you Spider-man...Thats why we call ourselves... VENOM"
 |
Moderator
|
30. March 2005 @ 12:02 |
Link to this message
|
|
I just read that in the local newspaper this morning. It serves them right.
My killer sig came courtesy of bb "El Jefe" mayo.
The Forum Rules You Agreed To! http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/2487
"And there we saw the giants, and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight" - Numbers 13:33 |
Senior Member
|
30. March 2005 @ 12:58 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yes it sure as hell does...I remember read an article that Dela put up about Blockbuster, I think. And this one guy/girl was saying how lazy people were in returning movies, and blah, blah, blah, and saying that people should read the fine print about the late fees and stuff like that....so when I read this, I couldn't stop laughing. Although, I am still trying to find that thread.
;)
"From now on we are poison to you Spider-man...Thats why we call ourselves... VENOM"
|
Senior Member
|
30. March 2005 @ 18:05 |
Link to this message
|
|
I have allways hated blockbuster, cost too damn much compared to the local video store. Rent games for 2.00 a week.
|
Senior Member
|
30. March 2005 @ 18:16 |
Link to this message
|
|
Definately! I agree with that one.
;)
"From now on we are poison to you Spider-man...Thats why we call ourselves... VENOM"
|
|
forkndave
Member
|
30. March 2005 @ 19:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
I don't understand how anyone can say that NetFlix has no late fees. It's true that you can get your 3 movies and keep them forever if you want to. As long as you pay your $17.99 monthly fee that is. Blockbuster has an online service that probably works the same. People that this fee applies to do not pay a monthly fee. I have a Blockbuster movie pass and I can keep movies forever also as long as I pay the monthly fee. I don't do that because I like to be able to get more movies. There is an old saying that there is no free lunch. I believe that this illustrates that. No free movies either. I only use Blockbuster because they're close to my house and I don't want to fool with the mail. The main effect that I have seen from all this is that people don't bring back the movies until a couple of weeks have elapsed and new releases are very hard to get unless you are there when the store opens on Tuesday. Fortunately, I'm retired and I do this.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 30. March 2005 @ 22:13
|
Senior Member
|
30. March 2005 @ 19:10 |
Link to this message
|
|
I think last time I checked Blockbuster was making you pay 7.00$ a week. They are just too damn $$$. The only time I go there is when I get a gift card to there.
|
|
Movies6
Newbie
|
31. May 2007 @ 12:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
Ok, for the record I work for blockbuster and let me tell you i love it. Now here's how it is plain and simple if you keep a movie out for over 37 days, then you should pay for it, cause you must think that you own it to keep it out that long. And one other thing, if you rent a 2 day rental or even a 1 week rental you have 7 days after the due date to bring it back before your charged the restocking fee now personally i dont believe blockbuster inc. she suffer for a consumer's laziness to bring a movie back on time. And frankly i think they should start canceling consumer's accounts that have a record of keeping movies out late and getting restocking fees. Cause even when i didnt work for them i never had a restocking fee because im not lazy. Consumer's need to stop crying about this and deal with it.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
31. May 2007 @ 12:35 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Consumer's need to stop crying about this and deal with it.
The last time anyone posted to this topic was:
philipman (Senior Member) 31 March 2005 0:10
I think two years is plenty of time to stop crying. Now Movies6 next time just read the date on the last post before you respond. :)
|
