These messages are comments to this news item:

Engineers dispute FCC estimates for DTV signal strength

news article released on: 11 February, 2008

With preparations for the DTV (Digital Television) cutover in the U.S. gaining momentum, many people have already questioned the government's preparedness. Now it appears that at least one of the preparations that has been made is even in question. The FCC may be greatly overestimating the effective range of DTV broadcasts. If that's true there may be millions of Americans who are unable ...

Read full article

Post new thread

redux79

Send private message to this user

Member

Digital tv is the future! It just happens to include giant aluminum antennas tethered to the top of your house

AfterDawn Advertisement

defgod

Visit user's personal page Send private message to this user

Junior Member

Actually It's quite simple. More than likely the government already knew this. They just don't care. And are also ignoring it. Just to force people to pay for cable/dish. More than likely it's the latter because most people that live in a municipality have cable already.

That really sucks for people like me because I'm not paying over inflated prices for DirectTV/Dish Network. I just don't see the point in having hundreds of channels that are never going to get watched. Just to have the few channels that I do watch. I live in rural Ohio approximately fifty miles between two cities with over the air broadcasts. The channels that I do get now are somewhat fuzzy at times. Even with an outside antenna and two signal boosters. So at this time next year. I'll be a few days away from no TV at all. Unless I decide to get some kind of dish. Of course I could just get the fastest DSL I can get out here. (no cable for me and many others) And watch most primetime shows online and still download the pay TV/cable shows via bitTorrent like I have been for the past couple of years. I know it's "illegal". I REALLY DON'T CARE! I believe as do many others that it is idiotic to have hundreds of channels that are never going to get watched. So I don't pay at all. (well except for the monthly internet fee) I may have to wait an extra day to watch my favorite shows. But I'd rather wait a day than pay too much.

Any way you look at it. If I can't get the stations over the air next year. One way or another I will get to watch the shows I like.

defgod

Visit user's personal page Send private message to this user

Junior Member

I found another DTV transition discussion on the SciFi channels site someone might find some interest in.

http://dvice.com/archives/2008/01/shift_friends_d.php

HearUsNow

Send private message to this user

Newbie

Consumer Reports and HearUsNow.org have a great information site on DTV.
http://www.hearusnow.org/tvradio/12/

And they set up a way to share your experience with the transition to digital television.
http://cu.convio.net/HUN_shareyourDTVstorypage

Consumer Reports site with all the info: http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/elect...v-206/index.htm

This message has been edited since its posting. Latest edit was made on 11 Feb 2008 @ 15:55

Rustbuket

Visit user's personal page Send private message to this user

Junior Member

It's actually hard to lock in digital channels and i'm only 7 miles from the antenna farm for oklahoma city. The radio shack manager in Norman (20 miles away) said they cant get a lock on ch 5-1 with a roof antenna. I agree some people will lose local air channels unless they pump up the wattage at the tv tower.. Or you put a antenna on a tower to pull in the signal.

Sooner26c

Send private message to this user

Newbie

Originally posted by Rustbuket:
.. Or you put a antenna on a tower to pull in the signal.

I heard one time, that in upscale neighbourhoods (the ones with snooty Homeowners' Associations), the HOA cannot prevent a person from putting up an antenna or a satellite dish outside their house. That's FCC regulations. I am going to be so ROTFLMAO when these fancy houses start sporting outdoor antennas.

This message has been edited since its posting. Latest edit was made on 11 Feb 2008 @ 17:02

DXR88

Visit user's personal page Send private message to this user

Senior Member 4 product reviews

thats there problim to much wattage and that the spectrume band is way up there.

they need to krank down the power also the Waves that the new signal send out was meant to be Focused.

Omni-directional Range has always been Digital Signals worse nightmare.

borhan9

Visit user's personal page Send private message to this user

AfterDawn Addict 6 product reviews

We are going to see a lot of these ups and downs in the transition its only the star we will just have to waitand see what happens when it all settles

Mawolfe

Send private message to this user

Newbie

I received one channel on analog tv, as I live in the mountains at about 30 miles from the sending translator. Now, with digital, I can't receive any channels most of the time, but occasionally I can get the same channel I had before. What makes the difference in whether I receive it or not? I thought it was better in the dark hours, but that doesn't seem to be so. Any suggestions? I have both rabbit ears and a rooftop antenna. Marjorie

This discussion thread has been automatically closed, as it hasn't received any new posts during the last 180 days. This means that you can't post replies or new questions to this discussion thread.

If you have something to add to this topic, use this page to post your question or comments to a new discussion thread.

AfterDawn > Forums > News comments > Engineers dispute FCC estimates for DTV signal strength

Post new thread

Subscribe to AfterDawn's weekly newsletter.

Follow @afterdawn

Engineers dispute FCC estimates for DTV signal strength

Popular products:

Hot forum topics right now:

More information:

For information about advertising on AfterDawn.com, please contact our media sales team.