e8400 vs. q6600

Discussion in 'PC hardware help' started by rinhater, Mar 2, 2008.

  1. rinhater

    rinhater Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    I am trying to decide which processor to get for my new build. I have heard that the e8400 is better for games, which is what I will probably be doing more of, and the q6600 is better for multitasking. About the only thing I use my computer for is internet, downloading stuff, burning cd's with nero, watching movies, listening to music, and playing games.

    Also I want something that will last me a while without having to upgrade(if I can hold myself back ). I heard that the q6600 is more of a future proof processor since more programs and games will begin to utilize all four cores.

    If Newegg had them in stock, I would have already bought the e8400 but nobody has them in stock and if they do, they are way overpriced. Tigerdirect has the oem version for $230. I thought about buying that and buying an aftermarket cooler like the arctic cooling freezer 7. That will still be higher than what I can buy the q6600 for.

    Do you think it is worth it to spend more on the e8400 rather than buying the q6600?
     
  2. dragnandy

    dragnandy Regular member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    896
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    well depends on what games you plan on playing. i think games in the future will eventually optimize quad-core and if your going to play new games, the q6600 is the way to go.
     

Share This Page