1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Am I doing this right ?

Discussion in 'Digital camcorders' started by ricster, Jan 20, 2004.

  1. ricster

    ricster Regular member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    I've got a load of MiniDV tapes to put onto DVD. My camcorder is a Sony DCR-PC101E and has firewire connection. I've connected it to my PC and am using Nero 6 to capture. Now before I embark on this exercise I want to be sure I'm getting the best quality. Nero comes with some wizards to do this stuff so I choose the one for making a DVD. It seems to capture at 25fps. The resulting DVD is OK but not fantastic (or maybe I'm expecting too much). My questions are:

    1) Should I be capturing at a higher rate than this ?
    2) Should I capture in AVI first, then convert afterwards ?
    3) Are there any special Nero options I should look out for ?

    Thanks for any help.
     
  2. Timinem

    Timinem Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2003
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Hello Ricster,

    Standard NTSC broadcasts are 29.97 fps, so if you fall under the US NTSC standard, I would say that 25 fps is too slow for smooth video. I am uncertain about the fps settings for PAL if you are overseas.

    You should always capture in uncompressed .avi format, then you can use Nero's Recode 2 to convert to mpeg2 and then burn to DVD.

    I don't use Nero to capture or author, as I prefer Adobe Premiere Pro and Encore for those duties, but the process is pretty much the same.

    Good luck,
    T
     
  3. malum

    malum Regular member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    I don't use Nero either.
    I suspect that it's encoder isn't much good.
    Capture in AVI then edit then convert using something else and see if it's better.

    I use Video Vegas for capture editing and re encoding which gives excellent results.
     
  4. ricster

    ricster Regular member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Yes, I'm in the UK so it's PAL. Nero tells me that 25fps will give about 1 hour of high quality footage on a DVD. That sounded similar to the HQ on commercial DVD recorders so I was assuming that was about right. I'll up the frames and see what happens.
     
  5. malum

    malum Regular member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Upping the frame rate won't help. It just won't be a compliant DVD that's all.
    PAL is 25fps
     
  6. ricster

    ricster Regular member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Ah, that's what I needed to know. Thanks. General question - how should the results compare with playback from camera to TV ?
     
  7. malum

    malum Regular member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Should look pretty much the same.
    The usual mistake is to encode top field first (DV is bottom field first)

    The other mistake is to think that what it looks like on the PC is going to be what it looks like on the TV (PC monitors don't do interlaced very well)
     

Share This Page