1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

3.1 or 3.2?

Discussion in 'DVD Shrink forum' started by r8edxxx, Mar 19, 2005.

  1. r8edxxx

    r8edxxx Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    It seems to me that 3.2 burns slower than 3.1 when using Nero. Is it just me? Which do you guys prefer?

    In what ways is 3.2 better?

    Thanx
     
  2. deadcat

    deadcat Regular member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    710
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    the newer version is slower in the encoding because it does a better job, simple as that. When it comes to burning movies speed isnt everything, that extra hour to do a deep analysis does wonders for quality, as does burning at 4x/2x instead of top speed
     
  3. r8edxxx

    r8edxxx Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Thanks for your response and I have to say that I do agree. How do others feel?
     
  4. zippyd

    zippyd Regular member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,302
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    I second that motion....huh oh yeah I agree too...
     

Share This Page