1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The new LAME codecs 3.95.1 and 3.96

Discussion in 'Audio' started by The_OGS, Jun 10, 2004.

  1. The_OGS

    The_OGS Active member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,483
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Hello all,
    I want to ask those with great knowledge what they think of the new LAME codecs, they have a different Q=0 than the previous 3.93.1 and are much slower, 140 minutes (vs. 16 minutes) to encode a 1.27GB WAV file. I have heard that the new codec makes much more careful 'choices' when it processes at the Q=0 setting (good!) but man, the time-thing is killin' me (LoL)!
    My example rip uses 160 kbs CBR and yields about 132MB, and my 3.96 codec does give me excellent quality...
    What do you guys think: just run it overnite?
     

Share This Page