1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Virtual CloneDrive vs. Daemon

Discussion in 'All other topics' started by hamilton9, Oct 16, 2008.

  1. hamilton9

    hamilton9 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Regarding mounting an iso, I found that Virtual CloneDrive has a smaller memory footprint compared to Daemon Tools.
    Is that true?
     
    hamilton9, Oct 16, 2008
    #1
  2. Xplorer4

    Xplorer4 Active member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    No idea, but for a virtual dirve Dameon doesnt work on my system so i fell in love with MagicDisc. The memory footprint is about the same as Nero Image Drive, about 15MB for what that is worth.
     
    Xplorer4, Oct 17, 2008
    #2

Share This Page