AC3 Vs WAV in AVI

Discussion in 'Other video questions' started by Twilite, Mar 19, 2003.

  1. Twilite

    Twilite Regular member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    I'm trying to find the pro's and cons of using AC3 audio or WAV audio when encoding my XVID's. It appears obvious that AC3 is better quality sound so I would expect it to take more space. However in the little bit of playing I've done using DVD2AVI to extract the same audio to both formats it appears the WAV files are a fair bit bigger than AC3. Does anyone know if this will hold true in the final AVI?
     
  2. Ketola

    Ketola Turned ninja Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 1999
    Messages:
    1,233
    Likes Received:
    102
    Trophy Points:
    78
    WAV files (in general) are uncompressed, so if you intend to multiplex plain WAV to AVI, it will take about 650MB per 74 minutes in stereo at 44.1kHz. You probably don't want that. The biggest benefit from AC3 is the discrete 5.1 encoding. If you don't need that, you can save some space by encoding the audio to eg. MP3 format.
     
  3. Twilite

    Twilite Regular member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    That sounds like it's exactly what I want. Thank you mucho.
     

Share This Page