Burning a DVD9 From a VIDEO TS Folder

Discussion in 'DVDR' started by Supergloo, Oct 7, 2005.

  1. Supergloo

    Supergloo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2005
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Hello, all!

    I've got a DVD9 on my hard drive in "file mode." My question is: can I burn the files using NERO and have it recognize where the layer break goes?

    I know the proper way to do this is with DVD Decrypter in .ISO mode with the all important .MDS file--but a VIDEO TS folder (with the files in it) is all I have of this particular DVD9.

    Is there a way to ensure the layer break will occur where it should.
     
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2005
  2. binkie7

    binkie7 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Messages:
    17,589
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Supergloo
    Welcome to aD!
    The video_ts folder should have an .ifo file which contains the info about the video. You should be fine just opening this folder and burning.
     
  3. Supergloo

    Supergloo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2005
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Thanks for the welcome, binkie7.

    Just curious--if the .ifo has the layer break info on it and NERO can read it, why does everyone say you should only use a .MDS file of an .ISO burning with Decrypter?

    I'm just trying to avoid a dual layer coaster.
     
  4. binkie7

    binkie7 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Messages:
    17,589
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    The .mds basically tells the software what to burn and contains the layer break info - the .ifo tells the dvd how to read the disc. I've only done two dl discs - both w/ Nero burning the video_ts folder. From what I've read people have better luck with the decrypter .mds method than Nero. The 2 I did will play on 2 of my standalones but not the others. The older standalones are more picky with this type of disc. Another reason I stopped my experiment at 2 - too costly. I'm sticking with the compression to single layer for now.
     

Share This Page