burning speed

Discussion in 'Nero discussion' started by redbirded, Dec 12, 2005.

  1. redbirded

    redbirded Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I was told that you can get better video quality if you burn at a slower speed. i.e... 2x is better than 16x. Is this true or was I talking to an idiot?
     
  2. Ben2

    Ben2 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Before I knew how wrong I was I burned over 200 disk at 8X all of them good quality.
    After spending a lot of time lurking on this site I discovered that I was doing it all wrong. I burned the last 900 disk at 4X.

    I can not tell the difference in color or sound between the two but the experts say to burn at 4X so that is what I do.
    That way if I post with a problem they can not say -- I told you so.
     
  3. redbirded

    redbirded Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    O.K. 4x is the best> Thanks. Any objections anyone?
     
  4. alkohol

    alkohol Regular member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    4,125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    For DVD burning, I highly recommend burning at 4X (it's the best and safest). Go here http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/265933 for more info on burning 4X versus 16X burning. I've tested with my own eyes, the 16X burning results were poor on Nero CD-DVD Speed scans. Even if I burned with top notch media like genuine Yuden, Verbatim "Advanced Azo" and Maxell (Hitachi - made in japan), I still keep it at 4X because I don't want any of my valuable backups turns into "coasters" and freeze down the road.
     

Share This Page