DVDshrink does the same?

Discussion in 'DVD2One forum' started by ABMone, May 6, 2003.

  1. ABMone

    ABMone Guest

    What is the difference between the free dvdshrink and the $$$dvd2one?

    Quality?
    Time?
    What?

    havent tried either one but isn't this a no brainer.
     
  2. cheezzzz

    cheezzzz Regular member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2003
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Time and ease of use......favor the dvd2one.

    cheezzzz_X_X_X_X_X_[small]Just another lonely Hawaiian with:
    P4 2.66Ghz, 120gb HD (7200rpm)
    512mb DDR333 (PC2700) SDRAM
    Samsung CD-ROM SC-140C
    Sony DVD RW DW-U12A(OEM for DRU500AX)
    DXC v1.52 online; v1.50 standby
    Smartipper/DvdDecrypter
    Dvd2one/Nero 551028 Enterprise Ed[/small]
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2003
  3. bullbleep

    bullbleep Guest

    DVD2One produces significantly better quality when compression is required.

    I use DVDShrink almost exclusively for episodics, since splitting them onto separate disks with little or no compression is so easy.

    DVDShrink also allows splitting of movies without compression, every bit as fast DVDXCopy and without all the nag screens.

    DVDShrink combines decrypting, reauthoring (splitting/deleting) and transcoding (compression). It does not remove macrovision encryption. It does not do transcoding very well. It is the single best way for mere mortals to accomplish reauthoring, short of combining disparate titles onto one disk.

    DVD2One does one thing and it does it very well: transcoding.

    I have encountered sound anomalies with DVD2One's full disk copy mode - often sets DTS as the default sound (i.e., no sound when played on most systems until you invoke the player's audio menu and switch) and often sets english subtitles as default (again, you have to invoke your player's subtitle menu to turn them off). For these reasons, I have all but stopped using DVD2One's full disk copy mode.
     
  4. ddlooping

    ddlooping Active member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2003
    Messages:
    872
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Hi all :)

    Traffic, PAL, R2, movie-only.

    DVD2One v1.1.3 vs DVD Shrink v2.2 (30%, no cropping. Better quality, 25%, was achievable with end-credits cropped).

    http://www.poker-faces.com/temp/2one-shrink.html

    The difference between the two backups is not as pronounced during normal viewing but is still very much noticeable. ;)

    Who wants to play the game? :D

    Mr. Shrink is working very hard to squash v2.2 remaining bugs; v2.3beta is already available for testing.

    P.S: DVD Shrink is about 30% slower than DVD2One.
     
  5. Oriphus

    Oriphus Senior member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2003
    Messages:
    4,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Slower, but better quality and gets my vote!
     
  6. herbsman

    herbsman Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2002
    Messages:
    3,377
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66

    DVD Shrink 2.2 has impressed me...it has dealt with 1 or 2 fussy discs that other software couldn't cope with
    I like to have both !: )-

     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2003

Share This Page