General question about fitting eps onto a DVD+r

Discussion in 'Other video questions' started by wallzy, Aug 15, 2005.

  1. wallzy

    wallzy Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Ok, so here's my situation. I'm trying to burn as many eps/DVD as I can without taking a hit on quality. The whole point of this is to watch them on my TV set via my DVD player (doesn't support divx). The source file itself isn't all that great of quality.

    Format: Matroska, Overal BitRate: 566Kpbs, Width: 448, Height: 336 (aspect ratio of 4/3)

    I'm not having any problems encoding/burning them to DVD, however, I put 3 eps (1 hour long each)on the first DVD with a bitrate of ~3200kbps and a resolution of 720x480. I was thinking since the source itself isn't that good, I should be able to put more than 3 eps onto 1 DVD without taking quality loss. Also, maybe I should use a different resolution, perhaps one that is acutally 4/3 ratio, like 720x540? Any thoughts or ideas?
     
  2. celtic_d

    celtic_d Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,352
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Encode at 352x240 or 352x480.
     
  3. wallzy

    wallzy Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Thanks for the reply, but why those resolutions? What kind of difference will I see in quality/size of files? I'm still pretty new to this... also figured out I couldn't encode at 720x540 (tgmpenc wouldn't let me :p)
     
  4. celtic_d

    celtic_d Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,352
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Because DVD specs don't allow for just any resolution. Although I guess you could use a non DVD resolution like people do when authoring SVCD's to DVD. Try 720x544 since it is mod16 unlike 540. However I'm not sure that DVD specs allow for 1:1 PAR (Pixel Aspect Ratio) either.
     
  5. wallzy

    wallzy Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Well, what i'm curious is why you are recommending 352x240 or 352x480 over that of 720x480
     
  6. k0k0m0

    k0k0m0 Regular member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    632
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    They take less size perhaps?
     

Share This Page