How many little childern could you take on at once? if you said you hadn't thought of this before.... the ages is around 6-9 if they were charging you on an open field and you nor them had a weapon how many of them could you "take on" before they swamped you i think 50 about.....
When I was 15 I was at my cousins birthday party and they rented a big blow-up slide. The game was that I would stand at the top (there were stairs on the side and a little platform at the top then the slide), I had to fend myself from fourteen 9 year olds and they'd grapple me and try to bring me down with them, while I tried to throw them down. It was much harder then it seemed. I was only 15 at the time and wasn't as big as I am now, but I really had to time it so not all of them could swarm. With 6 of them on me they easily dragged me down the slide. It was a ton of fun and we ended up with about a half a dozen ripped sweatshirts and scrapes and bruises. It was so fun though haha
I reckon I could handle 51, just to beat Trippy....If I wore hockey equipment, then easily 100+. I'd just lower my shoulder and go through the endless line of midgets.
Or I take it no one has seen Lord of The Flies, or Kid Nation? They would take you out trippy, then eat your brains for breakfast. Off-topic - sort of - but how many children do you think Mike Tyson could eat in one sitting?
were not talking about 50 kids surrounding you and running at you a few at a time, over time you could obviously take a ton of them. If they all rushed you at one time it would take less then 10. If mike wasn't hungry probably a dozen, if he was hungry who knows, maybe a few hundred.
What are we talking about then? He wasn't very clear when he asked his question - he asked how many at once. So I'm suggesting a Lord of The Flies situation, or a mob of kids. There's no way you could take them. Maybe the first 10 or 15, but after that, they'd eventually take you down. You would also have to factor in how well you could fight and the level of your endurance. Kicking 6-9 year olds in the face/nuts after several of them attacked you would become very tiresome if you don't workout. I'd probably just karate chop them in the throat until they took me down. I'd imagine they would run at you scratching and biting no?
You have to sign up for a site to get results... EDIT: The point was to show you that maybe some people do work out, and we're not all fat, lazy stereotypical Americans. If you work you, you can do many things....like bash small children....
No you don't. You obviously don't read anything do you? I finished the quiz and according to what I entered, I could take on 28 five year olds. Exactly, that's why I said you would have to factor in whether or not you worked out - level of endurance. I never said anything about anyone being a lazy American and not being able to fight. /sigh
Boy are these results wrong. How dare they say I can only take on 30. Maybe 30 if I couldn't get up off my back....hell, I would have to be half-dead to only take on 30. 100-150.....depends on if I had a big meal.
No way man, if you had 150 kids coming at you all at once, there's no way you could take them all. I'm pretty sure that would be impossible. Now if you are talking one at a time, that's a different story. Any of you guys remember all those little bastards from Hostel? Yea, kids like that would take you out quick. ***UPDATE*** Here you guys go, take a look at a situation like this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BS8NvcXmItk&feature=related
Hundreds.. You specify no weapons.. but how about some money and an ice cream van? Tis true.. I think sideways.
dragula your a wreck....... keep in mind that one punch to the stomach or head will put them out for around 8 minutes.....and yes i think 50 is an accurate number...the ice cream truck is considered a physiological weapon LOL 5 year olds are easy, were talking about 6-9 year olds here, they can pack a punch !! kicking is allowed for both parties