How many megapixels at the minimum will give me quality pictures?

Discussion in 'Digital photography' started by dipset121, Apr 20, 2006.

  1. dipset121

    dipset121 Regular member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    subject
     
  2. knc512

    knc512 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2006
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    My question to you is, do you want to print your pictures or just do digital slide shows. If you want to print keep in mind that the higher the megapixel the larger the print but just for digital slide shows 5.0 megapixel is just right. But do make sure you are getting a quality lense on that Camera. Do some homework first before going to the sales person to buy. :)
     
  3. kinza

    kinza Regular member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    851
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    As knc said, make sure to get a quality camera. Many cameras claim to have however many pixels, but when processed, the images are far from the megapixel claim. If you're printing out 4X6 at most, 2-3 megapixels should work fine, but remember, from a reputable brand like Canon or Sony.

    Most cameras these days are about 5 megapixels anyway, which is good for 8X10 photos and a little larger. I would recommend one of the newer Sony's, don't forget the memory card.
     
  4. thelox714

    thelox714 Regular member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    5mp should be fine..
    SD450. great camera.

    and "quality pictures"
    that could be subjective. what one person thinks is very good.. the other may not.
     
  5. iPirate

    iPirate Regular member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2006
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Is optical zoom better than digital zoom for camera, because I know it is for Camcorders
     
  6. kinza

    kinza Regular member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    851
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    yeah optical is better than digital. digital just cuts of the ends of the pic, losing quality. it basically magnifies the pic.
     
  7. tubbana

    tubbana Active member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    The amount of megapixels just makes your picture bigger. Optics is more important. If you have 6 Mpixels and some shitty chinese plastic lenses, you have BIG screenful of shit ^_^

    Optical zoom is ofcourse better
     
  8. omar3333

    omar3333 Regular member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2006
    Messages:
    282
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    well you said the minimum and i have a 3.2megapixel and it gives really good quality... but if you want a good camera go for around 5 theyre not too expensive
     
  9. PKGupta

    PKGupta Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    yea 3.2 MP is good enough for most basic or slightly advanced users. If you want VERY good pictures with like amazing resolution even when zoomed up for a cheap price, i like the Sony Cybershot W-50. It is around $250, Very slim, big LCD, and 6.1 MP. Thats probably the best deal for that price!
     
  10. MarkDogg1

    MarkDogg1 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2005
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    got a kodak 7.1mp 3 xoptical zoom 129.00 a deal
     
  11. teflonmyk

    teflonmyk Regular member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Messages:
    737
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    I am content with my 4-year-old Sony Mavica CD350 3.2 megapixel camera. Suits my needs fine! Plus, I love the fact that it burns directly to mini CD!!! I have been using the same 3 mini CD-RWs since I bought the camera...

    EDIT: Out of curiousity, I just googled my camera to see if any vendors still sold it. It's more expensive now than it was when I bought it 4 years ago!!!
     
    Last edited: Dec 6, 2006

Share This Page