I think the PS3 is cheap really.

Discussion in 'PS3 - Modding & Hacking' started by johnooo, Jun 26, 2006.

  1. tycobb

    tycobb Regular member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2006
    Messages:
    2,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    pc mag reviews stuff other than pc's all the time.Bluray will be a pc drive too.
     
  2. eatsushi

    eatsushi Regular member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    572
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    The other issue about the bad BluRay reviews is that it's probably not the player's fault. The first batch of BD movies were encoded with MPEG2 resulting in a less than impressive picture. If the movies were encoded in MPEG4/VC-1 most likely you'll see a lot less returns of the Samsung player.
     
  3. tycobb

    tycobb Regular member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2006
    Messages:
    2,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    I agree.That's the thing all of these reviews are based off the first bluray player. a samsung player but ps3 is 5 months away and it's made by sony who is the founder of bluray.

    I think the samsung may indeed suck! But I just can't base my "ps3 being overpriced" opinion off of this type of stuff.I know you must understand eatsushi what I'm saying...and sorry if I come accross wrong.
     
  4. eatsushi

    eatsushi Regular member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    572
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    No problem bro.
     
  5. LexZ

    LexZ Guest

    allright but same with hddvd in my magazine that i get it says that they literally hated hddvd and said bluray was better and people should buy a ps3 just to get the bluray, besides the season disks will be cheaper because they still have to fit it on 3 hddvds but on bluray 1 or special features on 2 and 1 on bluray. which will drive bluray disk prices down
     
  6. dblbogey7

    dblbogey7 Guest

    LexZ:

    I don't know what season discs you're referring to but current BluRay discs can hold only 2 hours of high-def content per single layer 25 Gig disc. This is due to the use of MPEG2 encoding which uses up more space.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray_Disc

     
  7. tycobb

    tycobb Regular member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2006
    Messages:
    2,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    True.Of coarse lexZ didn't say anything about the season being in high def which standard def would take much less space than 25 gig for 2 hours. I wonder when the bluray will start encoding in mpeg 4 or other so we can have a real side by side compairison of both bluray and hd dvd .

    I also would like to see a different player than the samsung.I don't care about the stupid format war or who wins but I am curious.Either way I think by the time ps3 comes out everything will be kosher. I mean alot can happen in 5 months and that's if ps3 doesn't get delayed.

     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2006
  8. dblbogey7

    dblbogey7 Guest

    I see your point tycobb. However, studios probably won't release standard def material on BluRay discs as this would be a waste of the technology. BluRay is inherently a high def format. Standard def material will be released on regular DVD's.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 27, 2006
  9. tycobb

    tycobb Regular member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2006
    Messages:
    2,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Really dang that sucks.I was hoping maybe a whole season of lost could come on 1 bluray disc instead of like 10 dvd's lol.It's annoying having to switch disc's and worry about scratching 1 of the 10.
     
  10. dblbogey7

    dblbogey7 Guest

    Putting a whole season of Lost on one disc would be cheaper and make more sense for the consumer but will be less profitable for the studios. So you have to bet they won't do it. You know how greedy they can get.
     
  11. dapspman3

    dapspman3 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    it really is a very good value for whats in the box I would have paid at least 400$ for a cell chip im my PC add a blu-ray player and ill take it :)
     
  12. tycobb

    tycobb Regular member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2006
    Messages:
    2,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    @dblbogey7 yeah I hear ya lol.Well maybe bluray will come down in price.Back when dvd's came out they were expensive too although not as much as bluray.But I mean I assume some day bluray and will be $10 a disc or less.It takes more labor to press 10 discs than just 1.But that's no time soon anyways.
     
  13. dnglebry

    dnglebry Guest

    Ty cobb

    Nobody answered my question. If i take the time to get the link am i any way benefitting from it, there wont be any minds changed and the information will only be scrutinized. ITs not that i wish to sway people from getting the ps3 its just that its not a justifable purchase so when people say oh its better than the 360 because and etc. i simply state its overpriced and why i feel that way.If you or any other person wants to spend the money so be it but im not going to simlply concede to the statement that ps3 is worth the money.Its as if you were to say chocolate chip ice cream is worth 30 bucks i would refute that not because i dont want you to waste you money,i dont care for your money i would refute it because of common sense and logic.Refering back to what i said up top about minds changed,when i say that i mean minds changing to see that the ps3 is overpriced not to change their minds on actually not purchasing it.For example im not sure who it was but someone else provided the link about the percentage rate for returns for the blu-ray players and did that do any good??? No you still want the link i spoke of just as you did before,isnt the information already provided good enough.Seems you have beef with me personally...the question at hand was answered point blank thus showing i didnt falsify a statement but yet you persist just as you did on the topic of Sony's blu-ray player being delayed it just doesnt make sense to provide the link for you to just to go OK.



    For the time being it is every blu-ray player ^^^^




    If you are not relying on polls which is what i said i would provide then why ask me to provide a link to a poll i refereced?You've clearly got a bone to pick with me or wish to agitate me but sorry to let you know you cant stop the dnglbry train BUDDY!
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 28, 2006
  14. svtstang

    svtstang Regular member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    4,565
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    haha, thats all i read!!!
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2006
  15. tycobb

    tycobb Regular member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2006
    Messages:
    2,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    blah blah blah.I didn't say anything that should offend you dnglebry.You said you would find a link I really don't care if you do or don't.

    No one answered my many question like why would anyone want to change our minds about ps3 if we want to spend our own hard earn money then let us spend it on what we want.I haven't said anything that would make you feel I'm against you.If you weren't so pro xbox 360 you wouldn't have this problem.
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2006
  16. dnglebry

    dnglebry Guest

    If you dont care then why did you request the link? i cant see how your a senior member and you behave the way you do with you illogical arguments and insulting tantrums.I didnt say you offended me so where you get that im not sure you just irritate me by asking me meaningless questions and when i answer them to calm your anger you dont respond so its pointless. I blatantly said i dont care if people want to buy the ps3 its just not a justifable purchase thats all so why you said what you said i dont know its kind alike most of what you post. Im pro 360 and you are a ps3 fan mascarding as a gaming fan,99% of waht you say slams xbox 360 and the other 1 percent praisese ps3. I'vew said this before but if your not going to have constructive conversations with me or towards me and actually have a general point of seetling the discussion then its best you stray away from arguing with me to satifsy whatever urge you have....BLAH BLAH BLAH
     
  17. tycobb

    tycobb Regular member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2006
    Messages:
    2,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Your the one that seems angry Most of those posts I wasn't even talking to you.I was talking to eatsushi,xyqo,dlbogey etc.I never asked for a link you said you would get one and an hour later I asked if you found it because I was curious.Now you take such offence but did I bring the link up.Nope.

    Listen it's not my fault you were banned last couple times so don't blame me.You bring beef from long ago with you and lash out at me for no reason.I am guilty of it too.But if you want to drop it I'm willing to.However you know we are mostly ps3 fans and we will defend the system so don't be offended when we do.
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2006
  18. dnglebry

    dnglebry Guest

    Im gonna drop it but me being banned has nothing to do with you so dont speak of it.The only time you refer to me is when your making a smart-a$$ comment.All i have been saying is providing links to you does nothing at all, i have said many a thing that you or other sony fans had flat out refuted then i provided the link and they still didnt shut up. If i get trumped like that i atleast man up and accept im wrong.I know this is mostly sony fans so i expect the ps3 to be defended but i wish logic was used when defending it.Not just rampant anger and illogical statements thrown in around a few true remarks.Heres an example i and many other have said the ps3 is more costly to develop games for than the other two consoles(xbox 360,wii) but it alwasy been refuted now watch what happens when i provide this link stating a game is cancelled for the ps3 and not the other two consoles it was slated for release becasue the ps3 was too costly to develop for.The ps3 is going to be a tough game to make ports on because the upside isnt that high for the company and the consumer.Its going to look the same on both the 360 and ps3 and will cost more to develop for on the ps3.By me dropping it and your "dropping" its it should just mean both of us cutting the nonsense!Im not saying you were on of those who said it was difficult to develop pots for all three systems but just most sony fans.


    http://www.ps3land.com/article-448.php
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 29, 2006
  19. Nephilim

    Nephilim Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    14,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Chill out guys - quit going off topic. If it doesn't have to do with PS3 then don't post it.
     
  20. dnglebry

    dnglebry Guest

    will do
     

Share This Page