Japanese Internet vs. North American Internet

Discussion in 'Safety valve' started by joytime36, Dec 25, 2008.

  1. joytime36

    joytime36 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
  2. david94

    david94 Regular member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    207
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    i dont think that the website is very good. it has no point and how do they know tht
     
  3. dRD

    dRD I hate titles Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 1999
    Messages:
    8,312
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    143
    I've been googling stuff up about couple of countries and their broadband technologies / cultures and have some info on Japan, tho not as an expert :)

    In Japan, virtually all metropolitan areas (and if you bother to look at Japan with Google Earth, you can see that pretty much the whole country is equal to a metropolitan area ;-) are covered with 100Mbps or 1Gbps fiber-optics that have already replaced DSL lines as the most popular methods of connecting to Net.

    There are couple of reasons for the difference:

    1) Like in many European countries, the telephone companies who owned the cables were forced to open them up to competition for reasonable price, thus creating competition for consumer connections without needing to build massive infra for each competitor. Thus, allowing even small companies to compete for customers with reasonable prices (say, $22 per month, including taxes, for 100/100Mbps connection :).

    2) Much, much more densely populated than virtually any Western country.

    3) Government has set certain goals for the country's Net connections that operators must achieve, such as the availability for whole population by certain year and certain speed targets.

    Another good example for a country with super-fast and relatively cheap connections is Sweden, where govt is subsidizing fiber-optic connections and making them available to even the most remote location in the country. With Sweden, this is quite interesting, as the country has very low population density -- much lower than U.S.
     

Share This Page