LCD vs plasma

Discussion in 'HDTV discussion' started by Bluedog42, Mar 10, 2008.

  1. Bluedog42

    Bluedog42 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2008
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Samsung 50" Plasma HDTV
    SAM FPT5084



    Samsung 52" LCD HDTV
    SAM LNT5265F

    These are the 2 tvs ive been looking at i already purchased the plasma and i have to say its very pretty but i was playing a game the other night for about 45 min maybe less and i get a slight image retention now i find this very annoying and im very anal about my screen being clear would a plasma not be a smart choice for me, i dont even understand why they would even make a tv that does this kind of ghosting after a minimal amount of time, i do understand the image does go away after a few hours of something else playing,

    but isnt that kinda lame? please give me some feed back i got 30 days to take it back for the 52 inch lcd for about 200 more dollars tell me what u think and if uve had any experience on these models.
     
  2. goodswipe

    goodswipe Guest

    Yea, bad idea. This is called burn in. Supposedly this isn't suppose to be a problem anymore, but it looks like it still is. Usually the tv needs to be broken in before any heavy game play. I think the average usage before playing games is like 100 hours or so.

    I would have gone with an LCD or DLP/LCOS if you play lots of games.
     
  3. URYNOME

    URYNOME Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    I work in TV and we have bought 3 50" Plasmas and about 10 42" and 10 20" LCD's. the plasmas were used about 4 to 5 hours a day and are both gone after only 3 years, the LCDs are on 24/7 and after 3 years are still working fine with only a little burn in on a couple of the older smaller models that have a static image on them.

    This led to me going with LCD at home.
     
  4. BurningAs

    BurningAs Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,756
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Plasmas are considered old technology now. They burn in, they exponentially get dimmer.

    LCD is the way to go.
     
  5. Icanbe

    Icanbe Guest

    Go with the LCD, plasmas are nice at first, but they don't seem to have staying power.

    I have a sharp aquos 1080p LCD and it's got a beautiful picture.
    You won't regert it
     
  6. joytime36

    joytime36 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I suggested go with the LCD.
     
  7. iluvendo

    iluvendo Active member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,118
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66

    Don't tell MysticE that!
     
  8. goodswipe

    goodswipe Guest

    LOL - exactly what I thought!
     
  9. diabolos

    diabolos Guest

    Between the two TVs you have there the Samsung LCD would be the better choice as it is better after calibration. But I will say this, the Pioneer 50" 1080p KURO plasma is the best TV (non front-projector) on the market and will soon not be made anymore after this year. Virtually all magazines and J.D. power and associates will back up this claim.

    Regardless of how you all feel about plasma TV the facts are that they do last just as long as LCDs do (if not longer). As for burn-in instead of taking your tv out of the box and leaving it on bright mode for long periods of time turn the brightness down or get it professionally calibrated. Also as goodswipe said TVs regardless of type need to be burned-in for at least 100 hrs before professional calibration and/or intense use. After that just use common since. If your not using your tv turn it off. You will not only extend the life of your tv but also lower your energy bill.

    Ced
     

Share This Page