If something has been proven to be harmfull, is that a reason to ban it? So what if something is readily available for you to choose weither or not to use it? Nicotine is an addictive drug, no doubt. Most users who try it don't or cannot quit even with help. That's how it was designed, we all know that. So obviously smokers are not as healthy as non smokers and as time progresses they will become even more unhealthy and possibly get cancer or heart failue amung other diseases, If you are addicted to nicotine, it is partly your government's fault for allowing the sale and supply right? They are allowing young and older people to choose weither they want to have a cig and most likely get hooked. In my opinion it is partly the government's fault for allowing it in the first place. What if you can't quit? Then you'r endangering your own life by starting in the first place. What if you started when you were a kid like most of us "in school" Do you have a case?