USB 2.0 vs Firewire....

Discussion in 'Video capturing from analog sources' started by Cman, Jan 8, 2004.

  1. Cman

    Cman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Which pipe is better for video capturing? I have devices that use both and so far, both seem to be nominally the same speed wise. My USB device captured at 604kbs and the firewire at 594kbs. Not really a huge difference but it appears that the firewire device (ADVC100) seems to be more flexible with regard to capturing software than the USB device (Plextor ConvertX)..

    Opinions?
     
  2. shorty2k

    shorty2k Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2003
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Well, i'm not entirley sure it makes any differance cuz if its for DV transfer then the miniDV can not transfer any faster than realtime

    One thing about fire wire is that it is actually a Network device realtated to ethernet technology i think.

    so it may be a little more stable then USB2 arr who cares... just use the tools that help you the most!
     
  3. Prisoner

    Prisoner Guest

    I am amazed that you are geting that with USB 2, I was just going to recommend Firewire, as typically more trusted for large or continous transfers. But as Shorty2K said, use what works.
     
  4. Cman

    Cman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Tanx all. I decided to keep the ADVC100 Firewire device and put the ConvertX back in the box. Guess the Plextor ConvertX unit will wind up on EBay..
     

Share This Page