Virtual CloneDrive vs. Daemon

Discussion in 'All other topics' started by hamilton9, Oct 16, 2008.

  1. hamilton9

    hamilton9 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Regarding mounting an iso, I found that Virtual CloneDrive has a smaller memory footprint compared to Daemon Tools.
    Is that true?
     
    hamilton9, Oct 16, 2008
    #1
  2. Xplorer4

    Xplorer4 Active member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    No idea, but for a virtual dirve Dameon doesnt work on my system so i fell in love with MagicDisc. The memory footprint is about the same as Nero Image Drive, about 15MB for what that is worth.
     
    Xplorer4, Oct 17, 2008
    #2

Share This Page