which live cd's have worked for you?

Discussion in 'Linux - General discussion' started by wolfmanz, Sep 28, 2007.

  1. wolfmanz

    wolfmanz Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    This is a list of Distro's I have worked with on two separate machines and have had success or failure with

    Success
    Ubuntu
    PCLinux
    BackTrack
    Musix

    Failure
    Open Suse 10.2
     
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2007
  2. deadlove

    deadlove Guest

    Every one has worked for me with the odd exception later found to be either my system, or lack of ram

    Failures ::

    kororaa (not enough ram)
    puppy 2.14 (faulty build apparently)
    videolinux 1.2b (something invalid about the graphics drivers)

    And notably suse 10.2.. It runs from the live cd ok.. but installing it fails every time. They have apparently released an updated bugfix version.. but I haven't tried it.

    The ones I always point people at are slax killbill (best hardware support) Dreamlinux (just excellent for quick ipod connectivity) and puppy 2.12 (good ntfs read support)
    64 bit with enough ram? sabayon.. great for recovering important data from a dead windows installation. Mount, find and burn all from a live dvd.. excellent.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 29, 2007
  3. bliffle

    bliffle Guest

    Ubuntu 7.04 and kubuntu 7.04 worked fine, but a pre-release kubuntu 7.10 failed.

     
  4. wolfmanz

    wolfmanz Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    I could not get the live cd to run at all on 2 different machines. Maybe I will try a previous release and see how that goes.

    Sabayon looks worth a try as well.

    PCLinux is going to replace Ubuntu on my dual boot machine as I have really liked how the live cd performs.

    Ubuntu Gutsy also looks good, but still needs some work before it's ready to try an install. Ubuntu Feisty was really buggy on my system and did not impress me at all.
     
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2007
  5. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Lately the only 2 live cd's i use (and install from) are PCLinuxOS (2007) and TinyMe test 6, though wireless on TinyMe is proving troublesome at the moment. Rock solid using ethernet though so that's what i use the most when i'm on wired. PCLinuxOS is very impressive and very stable, the thing that stands out is the inbuilt wireless support. Don't get me wrong, getting wireless working is usually fairly easy but just because you know what to do, doesn't mean you should have to put in hours of effort just to fail, when there's a distro such as this where it 'just works'.

    i used to like DSL a few versions ago but it corrupted the XP installation on 2 different triple-boot machines so i don't trust it for now. Wireless was far too much trouble to get working (ie in the end i didn't get it working). Puppy was a nice one, again i couldn't be bothered with the wireless on that one. Tried Mint 3.0 the other day on a P4 laptop, my God that distro took forever to even booy. Lost interest after that, however i read that 3.1 was allegedly leaner so i downloaded that, though haven't tried it out yet.
     
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2007
  6. wolfmanz

    wolfmanz Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2007

Share This Page