1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

what is the best format

Discussion in 'Audio' started by saqib, Mar 16, 2003.

  1. saqib

    saqib Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    is wma the best format for compression
     
  2. tigre

    tigre Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Messages:
    790
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    It depends on your needs. What do you want? Hardware compatibility - or only PC playback? Do you want to archive your CD collection without any quality loss, do you want near to perfect quality with reasonable size or do you want files as small as possible with acceptable quality e.g. for listening while working on PC speakers?

    The only situation where wma(9) is (one of the) best I can think of is to use it on a hadware player with small memory (that accepts this format of course) so you're forced to use bitrates arround 80kbps.
     
  3. cd-rw.org

    cd-rw.org Active member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2002
    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    WMA is strogly challenged by OGG Vorbis and AAC in low bitrate. Rumours are that AAC+ is very good in this, but we must wait and see.

    If high fidelty is desired, the WMA is outperformed by many codecs (MusePack, AAC,LAME VBR, OGG Vorbis..)
     
  4. obieobied

    obieobied Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2003
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Compression? Yes WMA compression is better than MP3.
    But I say, just stick with MP3!
    Unless they start comming out with stuff that only plays WMA, and not MP3, dont go there.
    Plus, so you save 20MB over ur whole collection if u convert all MP3 2 WMA...
    later u'll want 2 burn with Nero, and u need WMA plugin...
    [sure u can get it free by piracy, and so do i, but its not allowed in this forum so, forget what i said]
    And to tell you the truth, i dont hear much difference between WMA's Lossless compression [@ 700 kbps] and MP3's 320kbps VBR. Sometimes i dont hear difference between 256 and 320, so whatever.
     
  5. cd-rw.org

    cd-rw.org Active member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2002
    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    In most cases (meaning: reasonable bitrates/quality), no it does not.

     
  6. maxicow

    maxicow Guest

    What about mp3PRO?
     
  7. cd-rw.org

    cd-rw.org Active member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2002
    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    MP3Pro is only for low bitrates, which means low audio quality. Pretty useless piece of work. I beleive that OGG Vorbis is a good choice if one wishes to go below 160kbps. Based on what I've been told, the upcoming AAC+ should be sweet.
     

Share This Page