1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

BenQ Scam Hall of Shame

Discussion in 'DVD / Blu-ray drives' started by catfreak, Apr 14, 2006.

  1. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    cool. i won't be flashing back as all my media are working fine (so far) so not gonna tempt fate. hopefully something will turn up soon
     
  2. redice

    redice Regular member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    yeah all my media seems to be working fine as well so believe its best to leave it alone.
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2006
  3. zebadee

    zebadee Regular member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2005
    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Hi,
    @creaky & everyone else that's curious. Currently BenQs f/w situation with both the 1650 & 1655 is strange to say the least. The ftp sites that would normally list f/w once it's been released (& listed on global site) for about a week or more. Lists only BCDB(1655) & BCDC(1650). BCFC despite being found on units sold to the 'public' is still only listed on one site (China). So the support (or lack of it) for media such as MCC 004 is only part of the picture. The lack of response shows that no-one is really in the know. It could that despite BenQ by default leaves SB disabled for known media, as Philips has SB enabled for all media. BenQ is assuming (they have already in a info sheet[which seems to have gone since the sites were recently updated]recommended that SB be enabled for all media) that SB will be enabled. As a result are playing around with strategies & support of certain media. In theory once SB has been developed further + possibly being enabled by default for all media (even removal of the ability for user enabling/disabling). Strategies as we've known them could become a thing of the past.
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2006
  4. Nephilim

    Nephilim Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    13,161
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    If I'm using strictly Taiyo Yuden media is there any compelling reason to change from BCDB? I'm getting consistent 95% and above burns so I guess my question is more hypothetical than anything.
     
  5. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    @zebadee - cheers, sounds likely to me...

    @Neph, i had any burns turn out fine with shipped firmware BCFC, i just updated to BCHC cus i could :)
     
  6. kivory666

    kivory666 Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    893
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    @zebadee

    yes, i figured as much, THANK YOU for confirming that for me; much as my buddy mort81 concluded, it was I that mentioned you by name to him as being the "benq MAN" on here, i'm still learning myself and i follow your suggestions when i feel i could improve upon my own benq 1650. :) you are a huge asset to the Benq arena (users) here on AfterDawn~

    @redice

    as zebadee and creaky mentioned already, i too have NOT had any problems with the BCHC firmware for the 1650, while i usually do not go into as much detail as the others do regarding firmware, i think my overall success has been good due to the fact i no longer have any more MCC004 to use that were giving some users problems along the lines of recognized firmware/media write strategies...i use primarily MCC003 and YUDEN000T02/YUDEN000T03 when it comes to my media of choice these days, no ill effects so far for me :)

    thanks for all the informative talk in this Benq thread guys, i check in here periodically to see if there is anything new i can add/flash to improve quality/performance on my own Benq, definitely a good read.

    docTY~

     
  7. saugmon

    saugmon Senior member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2004
    Messages:
    3,548
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    I'll stick with the BCDC fw for my 1650. I've got the BCFC on the harddrive,waiting to be unzipped.I'll probably do like creaky,and wait for a couple more update options available.

    Zebadee: You're way outta my league on the knowledge of benq drives and their firmware, LOL.

    BTW Zeb, Did you get your user name from Doogal? I noticed that character's name when I backed it up this week, LOL
     
  8. redice

    redice Regular member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    @ kivory666

    thanks for the ifromation but i think i will stay with the firmware that i have now until everything gets worked out or they release anothter firmware version.
     
  9. kivory666

    kivory666 Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    893
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    @redice

    as ddp would say, teach and learn~ :) just making other options available to you...i'm still fairly new to the Benq burner scene, learning as i go along as well...

    docTY~
     
  10. 9mmruger1

    9mmruger1 Regular member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,717
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    I have been burning the Ritek P16's pretty exclusively til they are gone. After about 12 burns I am now starting to get 94 -95% quality scans with it consistantly. Using the BCHC firmware from TDB's. About a dozen of them left til I hit the MCC-004's.

    Cheers.
     
  11. saugmon

    saugmon Senior member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2004
    Messages:
    3,548
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    What I'm about to post may be a first for this Benq Scan Hall of Fame. Here's an actual "On The Fly"- rip and burn using:

    Nero oem 6.6.0.14's copy disc feature
    Anydvd v 5.9.6.1
    Brand new Cheaper by the Dozen flipped disc,which is a dvd-5
    Benq 1650
    MCC-004
    Burned at 8x!

    [​IMG]

    95! Better than I expected for On the Fly ripping/burning of an original dvd-5!

    I do love my Q's!

    I'll have to check out OTF for a dual layer!
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2006
  12. Nephilim

    Nephilim Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    13,161
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    When he isn't fishing he's the Chuck Yeager of disc burning :p
     
  13. saugmon

    saugmon Senior member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2004
    Messages:
    3,548
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    I'll be fishing today after work. Saugeyes Beware!

    Fish fear me,Women love me! LOL
     
  14. G101

    G101 Regular member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Sorry to be off-topic but what version is that of NERO above?
     
    Last edited: May 24, 2006
  15. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    :)
     
  16. G101

    G101 Regular member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    thanx
     
  17. saugmon

    saugmon Senior member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2004
    Messages:
    3,548
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    It's my OEM disc that came with my 1650 from canada a couple months ago.

    6.6.0.14. A very nice package. Nero Recode2/labelmaker-for my lightscribe/burning rom/express/full function disc quality scanning test of nerotool kit. A lot of great programs.These OEM discs come with/without the drive. For a couple $ more,well worth it.

    I have an older version: 6.0.0.21 oem and it was a very good version.Rip and burn on the fly-no coasters with over 300+. This version,nero's disc quality scanning test was grayed out.

    I also have nero 6.3.?.? oem on another pc,and perfect backups.I got that one for my dad's old pc through ebay for $4 a year ago.He's got no room for it,so I made room for it.

     
    Last edited: May 24, 2006
  18. zebadee

    zebadee Regular member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2005
    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Hi,
    Just a few scans to illustrate performance @4x 8x 12x 16x. SB/OS/WOPC all enabled. Infiniti branded MCC 004.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  19. kivory666

    kivory666 Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    893
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    @zebadee

    nice scans you got there, unfortunately for me, i no longer have any more MCC004 16x rated dvd+r discs anymore (Verbatim branded) here in the U.S., it's just a personal preference for me as i prefer Taiyo Yuden; however, i have recently tried burning even faster than my usual @8x on my YUDEN000T03s, with VERY similar results as you are getting with your MCC004s :) it seems that this Benq 1650 w/ BCHC with all the features enabled (mine are pretty much the same as yours) it produces outstanding results at 12x and even 16x :)

    i've been pretty set for the most part to burn all my media i currently use @8x, but based on these new trials that i have done, i might be "stepping it up" a bit like you :) your scans only confirm the potential of BCHC firmware on MY system, while you may have more programs/software used on your setup and your flashing experience far exceeds my own, i feel my limited trials on MY setup is a good indication that OUR setups/results are fairly consistent~ :)

    just a FYI, as noted in your MCC004 scans, the YUDEN000T03s quality is right up there with your Mitsubishi Chemical Corp produced discs, i've been getting consistent 97-99 burning faster (ie. 8x+ or more specifically 12x and 16x) on TYs 16x rated dvd+r too~ we all have our own preferences for media, to each his own, just wanted to let others that use TY media that i DO recommend TY's 16x dvd+r media for the Benq 1650 with BCHC firmware too~

    thanks again for providing the PROOF that with Benq drives on QUALITY MEDIA, there is NO need to burn @4x or slower...

    docTY~

     
  20. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    yeah, my setup doesn't seem to be up to 16x, though saying that i only did one or maybe two at 16x. I am however a true 8x convert, i never burn lower than 8x now. And my most common way of burning is now with Nero's Multiple Recorders feature, top banana; i too have virtually no MCC004 left as i sent a few hundred back to the supplier after the odd blip i had with them. No loss as i have more than enough TYG02 and YUDEN000T03's to keep me going for a while. Have done a fair few burns lately to TYG02 and YUDEN000T03 but not worth posting any more scans as they're just top notch :)
     

Share This Page