1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Moved to Here http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/531363

Discussion in 'Digital TV - UK & Europe' started by fergusrb, Jun 4, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. anto1969

    anto1969 Regular member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    steo have u tried it
     
  2. fergusrb

    fergusrb Guest

    Name: steo46
    Posts: 238 (5.174 per day)
    Position: Global Moderator
    Date Registered: April 18, 2007, 12:30:38 PM
    Last Active: Today at 02:44:52 PM

    Can you tell my why anybody would trust w****** again after the v2.60 file killed the boxes as you are a mod on that site you well know
     
  3. fergusrb

    fergusrb Guest

    Anto

    of course he is going to say yes he is a mod on that site that is the W***** site
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 7, 2007
  4. anto1969

    anto1969 Regular member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    oh well if thats the way he wants it I'm not going to be a guinea pig for no one I don't know alot about the w------ but what ive read I don't really want to know about him
     
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2007
  5. TAFSIR

    TAFSIR Regular member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    i have put v4.00ee on 2 of my orignal starveiw receivers this morning when the software cameout, its working great , no freezing at all

     
  6. fergusrb

    fergusrb Guest

    that is fine that is your choice and everybody else as well all we can do here is advise if people dont want to listen then they cant complain when something does happen
     
  7. anto1969

    anto1969 Regular member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Thats great Tafsir keep us posted cause as I said when its well tried and tested then maybe Id consider trying (starview boxes are alot more expensive here in Dublin)
     
  8. steo46

    steo46 Regular member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2007
    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Fergus get your facts right. W*****d has nothing to do with that site. and yes I have it on all my starviews and it working like a dream. I would reccommend this firmware to anyone who has a genuine starview.
     
  9. fergusrb

    fergusrb Guest

    Well you have your opinion and i have mine we agree to disagree

    Oh sorry the same words when the v2.60 came out oh works a dream till the boxes started to die then there was a scramble people will just have to make their own mind up weather put it on or not
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 7, 2007
  10. steo46

    steo46 Regular member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2007
    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Fair enough mate, but I think you will find out eventually that this is the best firmware available for the genuine starviews. No doubt we will get people complaining about v4 killing their clone boxes.
     
  11. anto1969

    anto1969 Regular member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Well ferg anything you've sent me or any advice you've given me, you've done right by me so far thanks
     
  12. fergusrb

    fergusrb Guest

    you tell me why the site you are a mod on sells the so called "TheBox" if the site has nothing to do with W***** can you explain that to me thanks and then i will drop it
     
  13. fergusrb

    fergusrb Guest

    Thanks for that but as i said all i can do is advise then it is up to the person or persons involved to make their own mind up
     
  14. steo46

    steo46 Regular member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2007
    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    As far as I know most sat forums have a sposor who sells products satfiles is no different. But at least you are allowed to come on satfiles and tell people the truth about the box unlike w*****d's site where you get banned for saying anything negative about his products or service.
     
  15. mikeygb69

    mikeygb69 Regular member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2006
    Messages:
    632
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    i got banned from satfiles for expressing my opinion about the box
     
  16. fergusrb

    fergusrb Guest

    ok i agree with that but why would they sponsor W***** boxes after what he did there has to be a reason for it i personally could not trust anyone who sells or distributes goods knowing where they came from after so many people where conned out of their hard earned money i am not saying he did but because the boxes where underselling him then that 260 file just happened to be released and now we see the problems everybody is terrified to trust anything in case their boxes die if that file had not been released everybody would be able to be happy with their purchase
     
  17. anto1969

    anto1969 Regular member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    just curious I only have my sv box about 2 months now, when was this 260file released that destroyed and killed sv boxes (just as a matter of interest)
     
  18. fergusrb

    fergusrb Guest

    A while ago prob 1 month i would say
     
  19. steo46

    steo46 Regular member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2007
    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    If anybody checks my posts on any site you will see that I tell everybody that the box is only a starview with a new front attached. that includes w*****d's site. I dont know why he hasn't banned me yet.
     
  20. anto1969

    anto1969 Regular member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    ferg thanks you've cured my curiousity
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page