Post your DISC quality scans here 2

Thanks greensman, will do some more research!

In the meantime, here's a new TY I just burned. Burned @ 16x on the LH-20A1HX (external).

http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s102/hobbit112/Incrediblesa20h116xTY16xburn.png

This was going good until the last 1/2 gig, then it went to pot.

Didn't do a jitter test but this drive runs high also.

 

last scan for a while.. my aunt just passed away. just comeing here right now to ease my mind....

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i196/Cincrob/LITE-ON_DVDRW_LH-18A1P_GL0J_01-Augu.png

 

cincyrob,
I want to extend my condolences for the loss you recently experienced. If there's anything that I can do let me know. Good luck to you and our prayers go out to you and your family.

...gm

 

Thanks greensman. i appreciate it.

heres a scan of a 16+r ricohjpn
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i196/Cincrob/ricoh.png

 

Here's a couple of new ones for me. Both burned on my external Litey (LH-20A1HX). Both ar TYs burned at 12x with ImgBurn.

http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s102/hobbit112/30020a1hx12xTY.png

http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s102/hobbit112/Talledaga20a1hx12xTY.png

Interesting thing is that the first one was burned with a VIDEO_TS folder while the second was burned with an image file. I didn't think there should be a difference in burn quality depending on what you're burning but maybe there is.

 

Here's a couple of new scans, 1 DVD+R TY & 1 DVD+R DL Verb.

I'm finding out that these Verb DLs burn better @ 4X vs 2.4x.

http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s102/hobbit112/Maninthemoon20a1hTY12xBurn.png

http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s102/hobbit112/25thHour20a1hVerb4xburn.png

 

got a couple scans here on MCC004 verbs burnt at 12x's scan'd @ 4x.then also scan'd the same disc with dvdinfo pro

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i196/Cincrob/4x.png
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i196/Cincrob/mydvd1.png

 

ant bully recorded with LH-18A on Ritek R03 (just in case you're having problems reading...lol)
http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/7941/antbullyritekr0395us2.png
recorded with Pioneer DVR-112L
http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/6484/scannerdarklymcc00395pina1.png
first MCC 003 recorded on the LH-18A w/ GLOJ f/w
http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/4671/songremainsthesamemcc00rs0.png
first TYG02 LH-18A w/ GLOJ f/w
http://img172.imageshack.us/img172/654/spiderman3mcc02rg2095ka8.png
ya'll can read
http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/6434/spidey3tyg0295piocs4.png
ONE little fricken spike away from a 98....
http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/9652/themessengersritekr0395aq4.png

GOT plenty more but these are some of the different media that I'm burning and trying to get both of these drives "accustomed" to the f/w. Gettin my nerve up to try a DL disc!!! Maybe tonight...

....gm

btw, NICE scans everybody....

edit: oops, changed to indicate TYG02 not MCC 02RG20....sorry

 

some nice looking scans there greensman..but the one you said is the MCC 02RG20, the scan says its a TY...lol

kinda odd with the LH-18A1P since these last 2 FW updates i havent gotten a 98 score. granted om able to burn all disc now. but no 98's lol

 

Yeh I haven't gotten a 98 yet either but the burning seems to be going better with the new update.

I've been real impressed with the low PIE's on some of this media, especially the MCC 003. You getting the same results cincyrob??

Didn't get the DL burn last night but gonna try tonight I think. I've never done one so it's about time.

....gm

 

@greensman,

If those DLs are anything other than Verbs, I'd recommend not burning faster than 2.4x!

It'll be interesting to see how your burners handle the layer break (and if your jitter scan can get past it also!)

Have pretty much given up on lowering jitter on my Liteys. Tried a slower burn (had read to burn slower to reduce) with no improvement. ;(

@All,

98s???? I can't remember ever getting a scan higher than a 95(except on my Benq)!

 

yes i agree the pie's and pif's are lower..plus ive noticed. maybe just be me but when i burn on the fly my pie's&pif's are lower to. when i rip to my hdd and burn from there they seem to be twice as many PIE's

 

Had to add these for the people that know and don't know.

MCC 02RG20 recorded with MTK 1818 at 8X.
scan of MCC 02RG20

CMC MAG M01 recorded with same drive at 8X
scan of CMC MAG

NOW if you people that defend CMC MAG media can't tell the difference between these 2 discs then keep using that crap!!!! I did the same thing on both media and didn't touch the computer when it was burning.

...gm

 

I bet those CMC mags aren't too bad if you keep your size under 3700. ;-)

 

First scan of a disc burned by the LH-20A1S...TYG03 burned at 12X

LH-20A1S scan

LH-18A1P scan

both of these were burned at 12X and scanned with the drive that burned....

....gm

 

shucky darns im at work and cant see them scans...gotta get around these blocks...lol

burnt at 12x huh??? new 20x sata drive give ya the big kahuna's...lol

 

Already had BIG Kahuna's....lol. I've been experimenting with the faster burns and I'm not getting that different of burns to tell you the truth. Comparing 8X to 12X burns on certain media. I've done a few 8X discs at 12X and they come out alright. LOL. I even tried a 8X disc at 16X and it went to about 12.5X and then backed down to 6X for a finish. Scanned the disc and it came out OK with a 93 score and PIE's not to bad. If I can find the scan I'll post it.

I'll see what I can do about getting you the scans since you are hog-tied. hehehe.

....gm

 

@gm, so it's a REALLY big deal when your wife busts them???....lol

Here's a couple of new ones, a 4x burned Verb DL & 2 Yuden 03, 1 off my external Litey & 1 from my internal one.

http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s102/hobbit112/BreakingtheWaves20a1h4xVerb.png

http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s102/hobbit112/Woodstock120a1hx12xburnTY.png

http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s102/hobbit112/Woodstock220a1h12xBurnTY.png

I'm finding the Verb DLs are burning better @ 4x vs. 2.4x. Maybe one of these days I'll give it a shot @ 6x.

The 16x TYs burn best for me @ 12x, a better "sweet spot" then @ 8x. Have also tried them @ 14x, 16x, 18x & 20x. Still get decent results but 12x is the best.

 

nice scans there guys... think i gotta break down and get me some DL verbs +r's of course...lol

i think the 20x Scan looks better than the 18x Greensman...

here is a scan i did this morning useing nero to convert PAL to NTSC then used clonedvd2 to burn with..used a 16x+r Verb

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i196/Cincrob/o13.png

here is a 8x-r TY thanks buddy...
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i196/Cincrob/meet.png

 

well i have 2 scans here the 1st one is the original copy from 2005 burned @ 8x and the 2nd one is from 2007 a new copy from the original copy burned @ 4x, they both are scanned @ 4x so here they are

CMC MAG M01 - DRU-800A
SONY____DVD_RW_DRU-800A_KY06_11-Aug

MCC 004 - DRU-830A
SONY____DVD_RW_DRU-830A_SS25_11-Aug