1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Post your DISC quality scans here 2

Discussion in 'Nero discussion' started by cincyrob, Jul 27, 2007.

  1. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Do their newest versions (NERO) support simultaneous burning?
     
  2. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Honestly couldn't tell you, i'm on the proverbial 6.6.0.18..
     
  3. garmoon

    garmoon Regular member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,971
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Yeah Nero Burn Rom 8.3.2.1 in Nero 8 Suite certainly does the multi burns. This is what I'm using.
     
  4. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Thanks alot alot! Is there no way to burn from separate harddrives? What I mean is burn two, three, etc. different iso's. I have 4 burners. Though I only use two. I would like to burn NOT MULTIPLE COPIES but, two separte data iso's simultaneously. Is that not possible without buffer underrun?
     
  5. garmoon

    garmoon Regular member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,971
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    If you have ImgBurn (free) then open two windows and try to start to burns each with a different ISO. Try nero Burn Rom also in 2 different windows.
     
  6. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    ive tried several instances of burning rom and decrypter. Havnt tried imgburn yet. But.. I would think it no different. But who knows. Ive noticed for the first 20-30sec of a burn, the drive wants Exclusive undivided access. It wont open even the most basic of programs when I first initiate the burn. DOESN'T matter which Harddrive im burning from. I wonder if 2GB of 6400 ram simply isnt enough for that kind of task.
     
  7. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    No idea, have never been brave enough to try it.
    At the end of the day i have 15 hard drives on this pc now, so no hurry to burn anything, only problem i have is if i get lazy then there's too much to burn and it's like an uphill battle. Needless to say i only got lazy once :p
     
  8. hobbit112

    hobbit112 Regular member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    @omegaman7,

    You need Cincyrob or maybe Greensman to chime in. I know Cincyrob has done 4 different isos at the same time. I know he used several different burning programs but how he overcame the timing issues which you mentioned, i.e., exclusive access to the drives, I don't know.
     
  9. LOCOENG

    LOCOENG Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    10,818
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    118
  10. garmoon

    garmoon Regular member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,971
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    @LOCO

    Too many digits left of the decimal. What do the blank BR discs cost now? All too rich for my blood. I guess bad burns would go the the good china set for coasters-ya know the ones for high tea.
     
  11. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    ive read VERY good things about LG. Thats a decent price. I would touch blu-ray before vista. As long as its verbatim anyway. I imagine TY is only allowing the industry their BD's. Its only a matter of time. :) 15 HARDDRIVES! Creaky... I am Jealousy incarnate. I gather your running 64bit? That could be a thing too. Ive heard that 64bit operating runs 32bit seamlessly. And ive got 2.5 TB myself. Windows wont let me simultaneously run more than 2TB. Im aware of the 32bit limitation. As well as RAM. My next build is gonna be a TOTAL FREAK! I LOVE MY 1TB harddrive. Some say its nearly as fast as the VELOCIRAPTOR! Does your case hold that many HD'S? Mine only holds 6. But thats one on top of another. I WONT DO THAT.
     
  12. theonejrs

    theonejrs Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,895
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
  13. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    You probably need a firmware upgrade. But thats a loaded question. I read that firmware upgrades are gonna be a necessity for BD drives. DONT own one myself, Just a guess.
     
  14. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    @omegaman7 - i have no interest in 64-bit at home (i do use 64-bit at work, in the Unix world 64-bit has been the standard for longer than i can remember).
    I have 6 500GB SATA HDD's internal to an Antec 900, 3 ODD's (1 IDE and the others are SATA), the other HDD's are all in USB2.0 enclosures, 7 are 500GB and 2 smaller ones. Oh and 6 more ODD's in USB2.0 enclosures too. That's just the main PC :p
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2008
  15. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    SO...You plug um in as you need um. Ahhh...I suppose that works. Myself, Sometimes I need to rip in a MAD MAD hurry. Multi drives come in handy. I can rip 5 dvds simultaneously and my processor appears to be doing darn near nothing when there's no compression. I figured it was because file transfers are nothing to it. Ive ripped 10dvds in under a half hour. More hardware and im sure I could top that though. Plus 3 of my opti's are getting old!
     
  16. cincyrob

    cincyrob Active member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    96
    sure there is. 4 burners going at once...lol
    once i get my new mem in i will do it again and post the scans...lol
     
  17. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Here is a good question. If one drive fails during the burning process, are all discs coasters? Or do the others keep going and finish? I would think nero would have thought of that?
     
  18. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    The few times that's happened to me, Nero just keeps burning the other copies.. of course paranoia kicks in and i'll admit to having CRC scanned the copies that didn't fail, just in case.. in my experience the remaining copies were fine, unless of course the failures were triggered by me messing with the pc (ie hard drive went ballistic) during the burn hence all copies would be wrecked..

    edit- of course these days, with multi-core machines you can mess with the pc and the burns keep on truckin', you just gotta love multi-cores..
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2008
  19. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    "edit- of course these days, with multi-core machines you can mess with the pc and the burns keep on truckin', you just gotta love multi-cores.."
    INDEED I do. I would love a quad core. My dual core athlon 5200 does a pretty good job though. NEXT, Its to the black phenom.
    I would never trust an intel! every system with one has seemed slower than what ive got. Though I havnt experienced either a dual or a quad intel. When single cores were a thing my 1.4 athlon did things quicker than the 2.0 and the 2.6 intels. Dont ask me how because I dont know. It just seemed more smooth. Less bottlenecking for sure.
     
  20. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    I'm only going by what i've read but
    however there's very little in it between the two.

    ..i have a few E6400's as it happens, they're 2.13GHz; they're pretty quick but no way on earth are they a patch on my Q6600....

    ..anyways, we're wandering off the topic of quality scans here :) ...
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2008

Share This Page