Post your Nero cd/dvd speed quality scans here

LMAO @ Rob,
(Little does he realize, the manager hired a hitman dressed in a NY Yankme uniform to break both of your knee caps for that.)

 

yea the last time a yankme(thats to funny) got close enough to see anything i just showed him that ring we stole from them in the sweep we gave them.. or the trophy johnny bench got for the MVP of the series..lol..

yea i didnt waist anytime getting out of there when the manager told me to go get 3 tubs to replace the -r's with the +r's

 

No need to cheat and lie guys.

I just went to the store with 6 unopened 50packs of -R's and my Invoice that showed what I paid for them.

And told them that I had higher expectations of this media because they were Always great before, but I got pretty poor results from several burns.

And that I wanted to exchange them for same brand just +R.

No Problem at all, Was told to go grab 6 packs of +Rs and she did even exchange. Provided me with recipt. Even though +R's were 35$ a pack.

The moral of this story is .... Just say the truth and you will have no problems at all.

 

here is somethig to look at. just did a multiple burn of invincible both on K-hypermedia 8x dvd-r burnt at 4x. crappy scan but they play fine. they start out good but then it gets nasty... well its not real bad but bad... they are playing right now with no problem so far.. i plan on actually watching one of these burns.. one is on my HP740i and the other on my liteon SHW-160P6S....




heck if i had a different burner to do the scan on i would have about a 97 or so..lol

 

Ripper Beware of cheapo media Has a likeliness to taking out burners.Chris

Edit ie read Creakys sig also spelling

 

Yeah, I second the beware of cheap media,
took out my old Sony Burner,
took it out for a night of loud music and cheap beer,
turned up pregnant a week later, then the cheap media skipped town,
haven't heard from it since.

 

Tee Hee Happy New Year Chris

 

cincyrob
i noticed you media id to cmc mag. i thought that was bad media id?

 

Yep, I'm fully aware of that guys, but thanks anywho. I'm not talking about the crappy crappy stuff, just some cheaper sonys or something. Do you really think I'd put a CMC Mag anywhere near my burner? C'mon guys, you know me better than that! ;-)



Edit: @born2ride: I think that media was just used to do a test mulitple burn with so Cincy didn't waste any good disks.

 

hit the nail on the head ripper...not about to waste good disc on test runs..lol

 

Thought so.

That's all the CMCs are good for anyhow!

 

HAPPY NEW YEARS

 

Happy new year everyone. !!!

 

ripper
cincyrob

using that media for testing to see if multi burns work?
does that media always test low?

 

It is good media to use for testing, cos if it goes wrong, then no one cares, cos it's only CMC MAG.

And no it doesn't always come out with low scores. I have seen 97s on a CMC MAG, but that's not important. When you scan it 6 months later, it'll be no where near a 97.

 

ripper
so deterioration is inevitable with cmc mags!
my firt scan was on page 19 i think. score 8 with verbs
i use and external burn nec1300 with a usb of 1.0.
what do you think?

 

Yes it is.

And as for your burner; well, it's gettin on a bit, so the last firmware update is essential. Also, the enclosure is only 1.0 speed, which can effect burning - and the scores.

Maybe time for an upgrade to a new NEC or a LiteOn; new drives are getting very cheap these days. Also, maybe time for a USB enclosure upgrade too.

However, with the first bit in mind, you should get ok burns with uptodate (the last) firmware. Maybe use slower speed media, 8x or 4x if you can get it.

 

when i flashed the nec to the 1300 it was looking for the 2.0 port pc does not have one,i gather just been relucted to spend more $ on this pc.
the reason i asked was all my scan start out good then go down.
was think it could be the slow port.

i normally burn at 4x or 8x
thanks