1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Post your Nero cd/dvd speed quality scans here

Discussion in 'Nero discussion' started by cincyrob, Nov 2, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LOCOENG

    LOCOENG Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    10,818
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    118
    [​IMG]

    I don't know why, but CD Speed has stopped ID'ing my media...these are TY02's. I've noticed it hasn't been right since I started using DVD-Rebuilder, but this one required no compression so it was a rip and burn.
     
  2. greensman

    greensman Regular member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Whadup LOCO??

    Try this for the newest version of Nero CD/DVD Speed. :)

    LINK to what you need.....lol

    YOu know except for that one spike of 5 that scan has 99 written all over it. :) Nice scan there buddy.

    ...gm
     
  3. cincyrob

    cincyrob Active member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    96
    yes a very good scan loco. getting closer to that 100 pif make arent ya
     
  4. LOCOENG

    LOCOENG Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    10,818
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Tried this on a whim....TY02 burned on the fly with Imgburn at 8X.

    I 11:01:09 Operation Started!
    I 11:01:09 Building Image Tree...
    I 11:01:09 Checking Directory Depth...
    I 11:01:09 Calculating Totals...
    I 11:01:09 Preparing Image...
    I 11:01:13 Checking Path Length...
    I 11:01:13 Image Size: 4,631,132,160 bytes
    I 11:01:13 Image Sectors: 2,261,295
    I 11:01:13 Operation Successfully Completed! - Duration: 00:00:04
    I 11:01:16 Operation Started!
    I 11:01:16 Building Image Tree...
    I 11:01:16 Checking Directory Depth...
    I 11:01:17 Calculating Totals...
    I 11:01:17 Preparing Image...
    I 11:01:17 Checking Path Length...
    I 11:01:17 Image Size: 4,631,132,160 bytes
    I 11:01:17 Image Sectors: 2,261,295
    I 11:01:18 Operation Successfully Completed! - Duration: 00:00:01
    I 11:01:18 Operation Started!
    I 11:01:18 Source File: -==/\/[BUILD IMAGE]\/\==-
    I 11:01:18 Source File Sectors: 2,261,295 (MODE1/2048)
    I 11:01:18 Source File Size: 4,631,132,160 bytes
    I 11:01:18 Source File Application Identifier: IMGBURN - THE ULTIMATE IMAGE BURNER! (C) 2006 LIGHTNING UK!
    I 11:01:18 Source File Implementation Identifier: ImgBurn
    I 11:01:18 Source File File System(s): ISO9660, UDF (1.02)
    I 11:01:18 Destination Device: [1:0:0] BENQ DVD LS DW1655 BCIB (E:) (ATA)
    I 11:01:18 Destination Media Type: DVD+R (Disc ID: YUDEN000-T02-00) (Speeds: 2.4x, 4x, 8x)
    I 11:01:18 Destination Media Sectors: 2,295,104
    I 11:01:18 Write Mode: DVD
    I 11:01:18 Write Type: DAO
    I 11:01:18 Write Speed: 8x
    I 11:01:18 Link Size: Auto
    I 11:01:18 Test Mode: No
    I 11:01:18 BURN-Proof: Enabled
    I 11:01:19 Filling Buffer...
    I 11:01:22 Writing LeadIn...
    I 11:01:41 Writing Image...
    I 11:09:56 Synchronising Cache...
    I 11:09:57 Closing Track...
    I 11:10:01 Finalising Disc...
    I 11:10:22 Image MD5: 455488338507bd5f2f3dbd57cacd926b
    I 11:10:25 Operation Successfully Completed! - Duration: 00:09:04
    I 11:10:25 Average Write Rate: 9,155 KB/s (6.6x) - Maximum Write Rate: 11,290 KB/s (8.2x)
    I 11:10:25 Cycling Tray before Verify...
    W 11:10:35 Waiting for device to become ready...
    I 11:10:43 Device Ready!
    I 11:10:43 Operation Started!
    I 11:10:43 Source Device: [1:0:0] BENQ DVD LS DW1655 BCIB (E:) (ATA)
    I 11:10:43 Source Media Type: DVD+R (Book Type: DVD-ROM) (Disc ID: YUDEN000-T02-00) (Speeds: 2.4x, 4x, 8x)
    I 11:10:43 Image File: -==/\/[BUILD IMAGE]\/\==-
    I 11:10:43 Image File Sectors: 2,261,295 (MODE1/2048)
    I 11:10:43 Image File Size: 4,631,132,160 bytes
    I 11:10:43 Image File Application Identifier: IMGBURN - THE ULTIMATE IMAGE BURNER! (C) 2006 LIGHTNING UK!
    I 11:10:43 Image File Implementation Identifier: ImgBurn
    I 11:10:43 Image File File System(s): ISO9660, UDF (1.02)
    I 11:10:44 Verifying Sectors...
    I 11:18:26 Device MD5: 455488338507bd5f2f3dbd57cacd926b
    I 11:18:26 Image MD5: 455488338507bd5f2f3dbd57cacd926b
    I 11:18:32 Operation Successfully Completed! - Duration: 00:07:42
    I 11:18:32 Average Verify Rate: 9,789 KB/s (7.1x) - Maximum Verify Rate: 12,645 KB/s (9.1x)


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Turned out pretty good if you ask me.
     
  5. greensman

    greensman Regular member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    NOT to bad for a choo-choo driver...hehehe. Really that's dang good there locoeng........ :) Try that new version of CD/DVD Speed and see if you get more info in your scans. :p

    ....gm
     
  6. born2ride

    born2ride Regular member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    968
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    i figure this would be the best place to ask.i know its not a quality scan. here goes. i have 2 of the same data discs one will back up the other wont. question is why is the green area so much different if they are identical discs.why is the read test and c1/c2-pi/po test grayed out on the bad one? the progress,position and speed are different?

    good disc
    [​IMG]
    bad disc
    [​IMG]
    thanks
     
  7. greensman

    greensman Regular member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    @born2ride,
    That is odd. Are you sure that both discs finished the process? And they are the exact same data and backup? I haven't done very many of these tests but when they are done they normally show 100% completed, you waited until the test was done right and didn't take a snap shot during the test? Just checking here. I will do some more research and get back with you.

    Sorry not very helpful. Maybe cincyrob will add something when he wakes up. LOL.

    ....gm
     
  8. cincyrob

    cincyrob Active member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    96
    easy answer here.. the test isnt finished on either disc.... look at the position on the disc's. the good one progress so far is only at 17.1% and only 456mb position on the disc read. and the bad disc progress is at 77.1% and 2057 mb

    so the good disc is about a 1/4 of the way finished testing and the bad disc is 3/4 finished
     
  9. gwendolin

    gwendolin Senior member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Lookimg at the first one it shows as 17.1% progress and the second as 77.1% progress...maybe they didnt finish the scan
     
  10. born2ride

    born2ride Regular member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    968
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    thanks all
    i think the bad one froze it was taking forever
    The good one i thought was done. how can i tell if the disc is done? i must be missing it! first time using this feature can you tell.lol

    i will retest both tonight and post
    EDIT;surface scan reads 100% on one and the other one add up to 100% so i thought is was done
     
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2007
  11. greensman

    greensman Regular member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Where is says/indicates progress. That should be at 99.9% or 100% to indicate that it's finished. ON the DQ test it indicates 99.9% before you X-out the stat results. Then is shows 100% not really sure with the ScanDisc, haven't done enough to remember. Man I'm useless this morning. LOL.

    ....gm
     
  12. cincyrob

    cincyrob Active member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    96
    where it shows 100% on that scan it is showing what has been scaned so far and it is 100% good no bad sectors on it so far. and the other shows 97.1% good and .02% damaged and 2.1%bad. and thats of what has been scaned so far.i'll do one here in a few mins and show what one looks like finished alnog with the quality scan.. it was agreat scan well still is i had a 98 on it with only 19 PIF's i accidently deleted it before i could save it. so i redid it and got a 95 on it with a total of 24 pif's
     
  13. cincyrob

    cincyrob Active member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    96
    heres the 98/95 scan i got when i redid it. still very nice
    [​IMG]

    and here is the surface scan of it and what one will loko like when finished.. and what you want it to look like.

    [​IMG]
     
  14. greensman

    greensman Regular member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Excellent there cincyrob!!! That sucks about your 'deleting' the 98 with 19 PIF's. LOL. I did that once with a 6 or 8 PIF scan. I think that I told you about it. Silly, silly, silly. LOL.

    ...gm
     
  15. born2ride

    born2ride Regular member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    968
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    cincyrob
    what the time frame it takes to complete the scan disc?
    does the drive speed matter. 4x scan or 16x scan?
     
  16. cincyrob

    cincyrob Active member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    96
    4x is the best results i think. and it takes about 5-10 mins i gues maybe more some less never really timed it
     
  17. hobbit112

    hobbit112 Regular member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    How about this as a DL scan? I dont think it's that bad since it's a Ritek burned on a LiteOn.

    [​IMG]

    Still have questions about the layer break, seems wierd.
     
  18. hobbit112

    hobbit112 Regular member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Here's another DL, but burned on an Benq;

    [​IMG]
     
  19. hobbit112

    hobbit112 Regular member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Here's a single layer. Also burned & scanned on a Benq.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2007
  20. hobbit112

    hobbit112 Regular member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    And here's another single layer. Benq burn and scan, TY media.

    [​IMG]
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page