1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Procoder or QuEnc Mode?

Discussion in 'DVD / BD-Rebuilder forum' started by TomBrookl, Sep 2, 2005.

  1. TomBrookl

    TomBrookl Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    UncasMS's Guide for RB on this forum, Item 5. Options.

    I set it to JCEnc because I think that is the free one that comes with Rebuilder. Is that right?

    The guide discusses encoders as if the reader knows what an encoder is and understands what acronyms like CCE and HCEnc mean. I for one, do not.
     
  2. TomBrookl

    TomBrookl Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Correction to above...

    Change JCEnc to HCEnc
     
  3. UncasMS

    UncasMS Regular member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    hi tombrookl,


    sorry if you got the impression i took too much for granted

    ENcoders for example are cce, hc enc, procoder, nuenc, quenc, freeenc


    TRANScoders are dvdshrink, dvd2one or rejig

    trancsoders requantisize

    dvdshrink (author of dvdshrink) on requantization:
    encoder create complete new frames and do not only reduce the motion vectors or dct data and thus take much longer but can do a better job in many cases
     
  4. agent-k

    agent-k Regular member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2004
    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    If you can get hold of CCE I suggest you use that.
    It is by far the best of the bunch and definitley the quickest.
     
  5. UncasMS

    UncasMS Regular member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Last edited: Sep 2, 2005
  6. agent-k

    agent-k Regular member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2004
    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Interesting comparisons.

    I may relent and give some of the other encoders a try.
     

Share This Page