1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ram = Faster?

Discussion in 'DVD players' started by gwoo, Oct 18, 2003.

  1. gwoo

    gwoo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2003
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Hello,

    I would like to know if Ram would make much of a difference when encoding MPEG, copying DVDs...

    Is it worth while to buy more ram or is it just the CPU?
     
  2. Oriphus

    Oriphus Senior member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2003
    Messages:
    4,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Its a combination of things.

    Firslty, the processor is the most important thing. Then comes the RAM, of which you can never have to much. Then a fast Operating System with a good ahrd drive is essential.
     
  3. ken0042

    ken0042 Regular member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2003
    Messages:
    687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    I've tried a couple of benchmarks as I build new computers.........

    Pentium 4 1.6 Ghz is a lot faster than Celeron 1.8 Ghz.
    512 RAM is also a lot faster than 256.
    1024 RAM isn't noticably better than 512.

    Next test will be with a hyperthreading CPU.
     
  4. jonnydoe.

    jonnydoe. Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Whilst yer at it can you do a p4 / athlon xp benchmark? :)
     
  5. gwoo

    gwoo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2003
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Okay upgraded my ram from 256 to 768.

    Not difference in speed. Of course my coputer did turn on faster and shut down faster.

    Not worth the extra money.

    Advice for all of you out there, save money on the ram and buy a better cpu. I think that is where the difference lies.
     

Share This Page