1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The (new) Official PC building thread!

Discussion in 'Building a new PC' started by creaky, Nov 27, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. theonejrs

    theonejrs Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,895
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    shaffaaf,
    You best find a better source for information than Custom PC because it's the same chip! Same cores, same everything! It even supports one more technology than the E8400 does, I/OAT! I did a lot of research last night and the only differences between the two chips is what I posted before! "Zero" gaming complaints!
    There should be nothing to affect game performance, in fact I/OAT could even help make games better if you're playing on line! No complaints of any kind from any of the E3110 buyers either! I would think that if gaming performance was an issue, with all the articles I read, that someone would have mentioned it. I think Custom PC is all wet!

    Best Regards,
    Russ
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2008
  2. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Trouble is, that CPU isn't available in the UK yet. The E8400 finally has appeared at a few less-known stores, but the E3110 isn't even listed as ever having been available.
     
  3. theonejrs

    theonejrs Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,895
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    sammorris,
    That's interesting because I posted a UK link for the E3110!
    http://www.tankguys.com/product_info.php?products_id=1814

    Best Regards,
    Russ
     
  4. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    er, no you didn't, that's a US site.
     
  5. ZoSoIV

    ZoSoIV Active member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2007
    Messages:
    3,454
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    I guess you could compare the E2110 to the AMD Opteron 185 i have (server chip)
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2008
  6. theonejrs

    theonejrs Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,895
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    sammorris,
    I see that now! It was in pounds when I first saw it and now it's in dollars. I was up late researching the E3110, so maybe I was just tired and made a mistake! LOL!! Sorry, my intentions were good!

    Best Regards,
    Russ
     
  7. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Haha, I know. Never mind, I haven't got a pot to pee in right now anyway.
     
  8. cincyrob

    cincyrob Active member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    96
    well i guess thats why its cheaper and in stock..lol
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2008
  9. Mort81

    Mort81 Senior member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2004
    Messages:
    4,030
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    116
    yeah, like comparing athlons to optys and C2Ds to xeons where the optys and xeons are server chips.

    I'm seriously thinking about pouncing on one of those E3110s for now. might try a xeon X3350 2.66ghz quad core later.
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2008
  10. theonejrs

    theonejrs Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,895
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    cincyrob,
    Names please! LOL!! I have no idea whose post you are answering! LOL!!

    Thanks,
    Russ
     
  11. cincyrob

    cincyrob Active member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    96
    sorry russ. i started that post. walked away and came back to finish and there were 15 more post ahead of me...lol
    it was for Mort81
     
  12. shaffaaf

    shaffaaf Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    46
    they were saying that it was optimised more for the workstation side than gaming, but it wasnt to bad.
     
  13. shaffaaf

    shaffaaf Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    46
    and as i can see it was about the 65mn xenonx, the x5 series. DOH
     
  14. theonejrs

    theonejrs Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,895
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    shaffaaf,
    This is from Tom's Hardware!
    Their answer?
    I think Custom PC is thinking it's like the MP Server chips, which aren't very good for games and require a different socket!

    Best Regards,
    Russ
     
  15. shaffaaf

    shaffaaf Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    46
    no they were LGA775, but they were the Quad xenons
     
  16. theonejrs

    theonejrs Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,895
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    shaffaaf,
    Oh, I thought they were socket LGA771s! There's a 2.83GHz Kentsfield based Xeon Quad Core available as well in socket LGA775!

    Best Regards,
    Russ
     
  17. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    For the record shaffaaf, it's Xeon, not xenon.
    As for the architectural difference, that makes perfect sense. The Opteron 165-185s were great gaming CPUs as they used the same socket and architecture as the normal X2s.
     
  18. shaffaaf

    shaffaaf Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    46
    aye...if im correct, the45nm chips have the same archetecture...but the 65nm didnt
     
  19. shaffaaf

    shaffaaf Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    46
    aye...if im correct, the45nm chips have the same archetecture...but the 65nm didnt
     
  20. theonejrs

    theonejrs Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,895
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    shaffaaf,
    the 3110 is 45nm!

    Russ
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page