1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The Official Graphics Card and PC gaming Thread

Discussion in 'Building a new PC' started by abuzar1, Jun 25, 2008.

  1. Shokz

    Shokz Regular member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    3,002
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    I don't really see normal monitors going above 2560x1600 for a long time - especially considering that's the maximum resolution of practically every graphics card out there... I want OLED screens :eek:
     
  2. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    The successor to LCD eh. Sounds impressive.
    Oled Display
    Uses less electricity, no need for backlight (perfect for laptops), and can be thinner displays.

    Sign me up LOL! :D
     
  3. Shokz

    Shokz Regular member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    3,002
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    They also have a larger colour gamut and a much larger contrast ratio. They're already used in a fair few small screens; my old iRiver Clix 2 had an AMOLED screen :)
     
  4. shaffaaf

    shaffaaf Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    46
    the samsung i7500 mobile phone im eyeing has an android OS and OLED, im very very close to getting it when it comes out.
     
  5. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Wow! That little sucker could support the Nintendo 64's resolution! LOL
     
  6. shaffaaf

    shaffaaf Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    46
    tis that, ro palm pre when that come out here, or 3gs, or the roumered pspphone
     
  7. Shokz

    Shokz Regular member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    3,002
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    The iPhone 3GS does seem very nice (since I'm typing this on an iPod Touch 2G and I love the thing) - it's just a shame it costs so much... Though all smart phones are overly expensive.

    All I need now is a Windows Mobile 7 (now rebranded to Windows Phone) device, an Android device and possibly the Palm Pre for WebOS and I'm set (go away and rot, Symbian :p). HTC make very nice Windows and Android phones - want a HTC Touch Pro2 :) The Toshiba TG01 looks really nice too (1GHz Snapdragon processor anyone?).

    800x480 resolution for the Pro2 and the TG01 ^.^
     
    Last edited: Jul 2, 2009
  8. shaffaaf

    shaffaaf Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    46
    damn you, just checked out the TG01!!!! OMG!

    and the HTC hero is enticing, im, loving the "chin", keeps the screen from dying.

    yep i had an iphone 3g, which i sold faulty, cause apple said its be £150 to repair, due to the water damage marker being flagged, though i have read that sweaty palms can set that off!. i have never had it near water.
     
  9. rick5446

    rick5446 Guest

    I'm having problems getting the Computer screen on my TV. I've tried about three different types of ATI,the latest being ATI 9.3[XT1600]. If I remove the drivers and Catalyst its fine, but the Quality is not the same
    XT1600
     
  10. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Shokz: Rage! They're not the same! Yes, the pixel count is similar, but I much prefer 1280x1024 to 1440x900.
    Omega: I wouldn't count on it, the next step up from WQXGA (2560x1600) is QHD (3840x2160/3840x2400), there are about four displays that have been made so far to use that resolution, but all of them are at least a year old, and cost around $40,000.
    Shokz: The maximum resolution of DVI is 2560x1600, the maximum resolution of Displayport (which some cards already have, and indeed the Dell 3008WFP has a connector for) is 3840x2160.
    Rick: You'll have to better explain "the quality is not the same"
     
  11. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    40,000$!!! Thats ridiculous. I demand you TELL them to drop the price sam! LOL! OBVIOUSLY joking :)
     
  12. rick5446

    rick5446 Guest

    The Resolution is not the same on my monitor without the ATI as without the Video drivers even set at 32bit 1024x768
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 3, 2009
  13. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Well yeah and apart from that the CPU is rendering the video, so it will be laggy as hell. Why would you uninstall the graphics drivers?
     
  14. rick5446

    rick5446 Guest

    The ATI Drivers will not allow for VIEWING on my TV
     
  15. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    well, have you set TV mode up correctly? There are lots of options within catalyst to configure the display for a TV, there is probably an option in there that is set wrong.
     
  16. rick5446

    rick5446 Guest

    You've really only got 2 Options Wizard or Advanced.I've tried everything from auto detect TV to setting the Monitor and TV to TV and Monitor. Oh yea I read instructions very thoroughly all checks in proper place
    I really think its in the operating system, because when I uninstall ATI. At Re start-up,Windows auto-detects Vid card but won't install Drivers
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 3, 2009
  17. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    yes, but have you set the correct resolution, refresh rate and format? (NTSC/PAL)
     
  18. rick5446

    rick5446 Guest

    Well of course I have, my TV IS A 1080p, and even if I did'nt AUTO DETECT should have picked it up
    Also XP should have picked up some sort of drivers [Generic or something]
     
  19. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    XP will not automatically install graphics drivers at all. It simply renders the desktop in software. Vista, however, does have its own primitive graphics driver. The TV is 1920x1080, how is it connected?
     
  20. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Vista has a primitive driver eh? Huh. Windows 7's native graphics driver is incredible to say the least. I ran it for over a week playing Left 4 dead with minimal stuttering.

    On another note, loving "Evga Precision" as opposed to Riva tuner. It just about made me rip my hair out. With the damn driver signing BS! Well...its a thing of the past. At present, all I want is my fan's control speed.

    And on yet another note. Windows 7, GTX 260(216cores), 186.18 Nvidia driver, ALL settings at their highest, 60Fps with NO stutter. In-friggin-credible LOL! Left 4 dead by the way LOL
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2009

Share This Page