1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The Official PC building thread -3rd Edition

Discussion in 'Building a new PC' started by ddp, Jul 16, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. theonejrs

    theonejrs Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,895
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Sam,
    That's what it said on the package. They do make a couple of 2 ball fans in the Gentle Typhoon series. I notice that any mention of the type of bearings is absent from their website or advertising, which is curious as they shout it to the rooftops when they are Fluid Dynamic or Sleeve bearings! What ever they are it's pretty quiet, but not 12.8 dBA quiet. I'll find out next week!

    Russ
     
  2. shaffaaf

    shaffaaf Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    46
    anandtech reportings of RC1 of Win7 that the performance is around the same, some thigns are a few (i mean literally, 1 or 2) seconds better than vista some arnt by the same amount (both 64 bit) and overall both 64 bits are alot better than xp 64 (esp in gaming).


    i just want my vista style task bar and im ready to swtich
     
  3. Red_Maw

    Red_Maw Regular member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    913
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    All the hype about it and it turns out to be roughly the same, rather disappointing imo. Probably just going to stick with linux as my next OS if I can get it to work properly.
     
  4. Estuansis

    Estuansis Active member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,523
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    68
    Yeah but performance isn't what the hype is about. That's what hardware is for. The main concern is functionality. Vista has much less than XP. Windows 7, even in the pre-release, is already more functional than Vista ever was. Just a lot less hassle. Kinda how they released Windows ME, but 2000 was already much better. Sort of a reverse example, but you get the picture.

    Linux is very powerful and useful, but it's a hassle to do even basic tasks. Almost everything is command line based.

    Exactly my theory with the vibration dampeners on everything. Should cut down the noise quite nicely :)
     
  5. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    It is indeed

    Sure is :)

    Ah, bliss!, i wouldn't have it any other way :p
     
  6. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    LOL creaky. People allow themselves to intimidated too easily. OH...thats me LOL!!! If there were no challenges in life, there would be no progress. I dont know if anyone has ever said that, but it sure makes sense.
     
  7. Estuansis

    Estuansis Active member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,523
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    68
    Well I've spent quite a bit of time with several different distros of Linux. Testing and learning what the limits are. I'm not adept, but I can make some use of it if I have to. The only thing keeping me from converting and getting in-depth is the fact that I play games. Without full games functionality, Linux is about as useful to me as using my parents' old Celeron D.

    I'm not a multi-media enthusiast. And I don't do much, if any, burning. Nor am I a programmer or graphic artist. So many of the finer advantages of Linux are lost to me. All my machines were built to play games to some extent.
     
  8. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    I do however understand where your coming from Estuansis. I do like PLUG AND PLAY. Certainly when I "just want it to work" LOL!

    I REALLY wanna try my hand at programming. It'll happen! I don't give up very easily. And since I spend more time on a computer then is healthy (LOL), it shouldn't take as long as one would think. Just know that when I do produce a fundamental change to the world of programming, it won't be for the money. BELIEVE IT. Its simply the way I am :D Im interested in the betterment of mankind!!!
     
  9. Estuansis

    Estuansis Active member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,523
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    68
    Right. My machines revolve around working as well as possible with every game and program. Which includes playing well with other PCs as well. Linux is great for the geek community, but sadly, program compatibility just isn't there. Gaming can be done on Linux, but only with a few choice games. Not to mention it throws my sound card and Crossfire out the window :p

    I can program to an extent. Basic high school courses on visual basic and C/C++/C#. So I have a good structural foundation. But I want to work on hardware, not software :)

    Meh, working some bugs out of my Logitech MX518 after I painted and rebuilt it. Adjusting tactile response on the buttons and moving my added weights and whatnot. I fancy myself a bit of a hardware modder. I've got custom work in every case in my room XD
     
    Last edited: May 7, 2009
  10. theonejrs

    theonejrs Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,895
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
  11. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Cor lummee. That speaks volumes about Vista, and of XP. XP's execution had been (repeatedly) staved off 'til next year and Vista is swapping places on the chopping block eh. Shame :)

    http://i.my.afterdawn.com/original/22846.jpg
     
    Last edited: May 7, 2009
  12. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Stability:
    XP > Vista > 98 > 95 > 3.1 > Me
    Performance:
    98 > XP > (Most MS OSes until 2030) > Vista

     
  13. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    *creaky chokes on his Apple Pie & custard*
     
  14. theonejrs

    theonejrs Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,895
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Sam,
    I may be dense, but could you please explain what that all that means, because I don't have a clue,,especially the last line!

    TIA,
    Russ
     
  15. shaffaaf

    shaffaaf Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    46
    mien would be

    vista>98>XP (the one si have used)

    Vista>xp>98
     
  16. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    > = Better than
    so Stability x > y > z
    means x is better than y, y is better than z.
     
  17. ddp

    ddp Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Messages:
    39,164
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    143
    & "a" is better then them all.
     
  18. Estuansis

    Estuansis Active member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,523
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    68
    LOL at your treatment of Windows Me and Vista. Vista isn't near as bad as Me was. At least Vista is mostly functional and decently intuitive to use. In Me I've had it stop detecting a basic USB optical mouse that worked fine in 2000 on another machine. Me was a waste. 2000 was actually pretty nice.
     
  19. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Hence putting Me at the bottom for stability. It was still a much faster OS than Vista is though.
     
  20. Estuansis

    Estuansis Active member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,523
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    68
    Yeah but with an able machine, the performance in Vista is close to that of XP. It's supposed to take advantage of the newest and fastest hardware. Only problem was it was too big a jump for even slightly aged entry-level hardware. Which most home users have.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page