1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The Official PC building thread -3rd Edition

Discussion in 'Building a new PC' started by ddp, Jul 16, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    I can entirely understand why you wouldn't want to install SP3 and IE8, however, when I used XP last I used both as SP3 was required in order to use remote desktop above 1600x1200, and ie8 is, in my opinion, better than ie7.
     
  2. Estuansis

    Estuansis Active member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,523
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    68
    That's subjective. IMO both IE8 and IE7 are terribly designed, copy-cats, and resource hogs. I don't even bother to use them at all. I don't even think my current format of Win 7 has started IE up once yet.
     
  3. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    I just remember ie7 being extremely slow and very unstable. Don't mistake me for saying ie8 is good, it isn't. However, it proves a handy backup browser for when chrome fails. For example, uTorrent's WebUI is now only compatible with ie and firefox.
    ie also has a better downloader than chrome, as it is not cache-tagged.
     
  4. FredBun

    FredBun Active member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    is ie8 any quicker than 7?
     
  5. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    It depends. It seems like it on high-end PCs, but not for everyone...
     
  6. Estuansis

    Estuansis Active member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,523
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    68
    I wouldn't even bother. Currently running Firefox 3.6 exclusively and happy as a clam :)
     
  7. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Ditto, across my fleet
     
  8. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    I abandoned Firefox after the absolute travesty that was 3.5. Maybe I can be tempted to use it again, but chrome suffices for now.
     
  9. creaky

    creaky Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    I can't stand Chrome, i do use it but just don't like it. FF is 100% stable for me across many machines/OSes, and i use a lot of FF's addons. Chrome is virtually barren with regards to addons/functionality, it's like using a browser from the days of the beginning of the internet, in fact ancient Netscape browsers rate higher than Chrome for me.
     
  10. Estuansis

    Estuansis Active member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,523
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    68
    Supposing you had the same stability issues as me? It crashed about 3-4 times a day for me. 3.6 seems to have fixed that though. Haven't had a single issue since the update. Not to mention the new "Personas" feature is cool as hell :)

    Yeah same here. It's relatively well made, but I just don't like the interface at all. It's an absolute pain for me to use.

    I wouldn't be quite so harsh, except that I also found Netscape easier to use and much more intuitive :p
     
  11. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    More than 3-4 times a day, it crashed whenever I loaded something more content rich than google, utterly unusable.
    The chrome interface is reasonable I think, it's not great because as you say, it's so barren, but on the other hand it's un-cluttered, and it performs better than any other browser I've used.
     
  12. Estuansis

    Estuansis Active member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,523
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    68
    That's on an individual basis then. It only crashed for me when having more than a few tabs open, which is quite often...

    LOL does the performance of our web browsers even matter at this point? You can run Crysis just about maxed at 2560 res and you're commenting on browser performance XD

    I'll admit though that Firefox can be a resource hog in its own right. It commonly breaks 1GB of RAM usage for me... though part of that may have been a memory leak fixed in v3.6(also might have had something to do with the stability) because it doesn't seem to do that as often anymore.
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2010
  13. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Chrome does use a lot of RAM, but nowhere near as much as firefox. I do often keep a lot of tabs open with both, typically I can keep chrome below 1.3GB, but Firefox could easily run past 2GB if unchecked.
     
  14. shaffaaf

    shaffaaf Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    46
    using FF3.6 myself, not had a problem. have ie8 as a backup, and not seen the need to swtich to chrome. if i wasnt lazy, chrome would be my back up.

    but i seem to only need ie when doing asda/tesco online shopping lol.


    XP users, you might want to upgrade for newer hard drives soon:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8557144.stm
     
  15. FredBun

    FredBun Active member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
  16. sammorris

    sammorris Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    33,335
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Indeed, 4KB cluster size drives are starting to appear, the WD10EARS is the first I believe.
    Not much to say about the 980X really Fred, it's out of the price range of everyone here. Although it could give some interesting info about how 6-core CPUs may perform in applications, it's not a new CPU in its own right, just a Bloomfield i7 with two extra cores. I'll reserve any judgement about how 'good' they are until the mainstream versions arrive, which won't be for some time to come (last I heard).
     
  17. FredBun

    FredBun Active member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    okey dokei
     
  18. greensman

    greensman Regular member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    That's a presumptuous statement innit?? lol. I can't afford it, you can't afford it, but who knows the finances of "everyone" here?? lol. ;)
     
  19. shaffaaf

    shaffaaf Regular member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    46
    lol sam, thats a bit mean, who knows who can afford it?

    its a typical extreme CPU, priced out of the norm, but this time there is nothing that can get to its level ont he mainstream, as there noramlly is (ala 920 and 965).

    3d modelers and video guys with love 6 cores though.
     
  20. omegaman7

    omegaman7 Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Indeed. I have money seeping from my pores! LOL!

    I wonder how hot it gets...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page