1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Why BladeEnc is so bad?

Discussion in 'Audio' started by cd-rw.org, Mar 18, 2002.

  1. cd-rw.org

    cd-rw.org Active member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2002
    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    For some reason many people consider the Blade Encoder as a high quality MP3 compressor, while this is certainly not the case.

    Garbriel Bouvigne summarizes Blade's faults briefly (audiofora.com):

    -No lowpassing
    -wrong transcient detection
    -too late short block switching
    -bad reservoir handling
    -no joint stereo
    -non optimal huffman compression
    -a lot of bugs everywhere
    -wrong ath
    -bad best quantization selection
    -no scalefactor use
    -no scfsi

    Very technical stuff, but the point is that there is no reason AT ALL to use BladeEnc.

    The highest quality MP3 compressor at the moment is LAME MP3 Encoder. Especially in VBR modes it delivers outstanding quality.

    http://www.cd-rw.org/software/audio_software/audio_encoders/lame_mp3_encoder.cfm

     

Share This Page